Click here to MyFlorida Home Page  
Clear Dot Image Cabinet Affairs

image

Transcript

Audio
Other Dates

 



AGENDA
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND
MAY 11, 1999



Item 1 Minutes

Submittal of the Minutes of the March 23, 1999 Cabinet Meeting.

RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE



Item 2 Nature Coast Industries, Inc. Aquaculture Lease Transfers

REQUEST: Consideration of a request to transfer 18 individual aquaculture leases, consisting of 42 acres, to Nature Coast Industries, Inc.

COUNTY: Levy

TRANSFEREE: Nature Coast Industries, Inc., a Florida corporation

LOCATIONS: Gulf Jackson, Derricks and Pelican Reef high-density lease areas located in the Gulf of Mexico, in the vicinity of Cedar Key, Florida.

CONSIDERATION: N/A

STAFF REMARKS: On June 16, 1992, the Board of Trustees granted the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) authority to issue 71 aquaculture leases in Levy County. In response to requests from the Levy County Board of County Commissioners, additional acreage was made available for aquacultural development. On August 8, 1995, and on March 11, 1997, authority was granted to issue 131 additional leases in Levy County, bringing the total to 220 aquaculture leases, which account for 572 acres of sovereignty submerged lands.

Nature Coast Industries, Inc., (NCI) initially requested that 17 aquaculture leases and two aquaculture lease applications be transferred from individual leaseholders to the corporation. The two aquaculture lease applications have subsequently been approved and the actual leases will be transferred if approved; also, one request for a lease transfer has been withdrawn. Additionally, two officers of NCI requested that their individual leases be reassigned to the corporation; these transactions have been completed administratively. Each lease referenced in Nature Coast Industries' request provides that it may be subleased, assigned or otherwise transferred upon written consent of the Lessor. Since 1994, the Division of Marine Resources, through its delegation of authority, has transferred or reassigned approximately 125 aquaculture leases; approximately 50 lease transfers, in whole or in part, have been approved in Levy County.

However, the transfer of 18 leases to a single corporate entity has prompted concern from some members of the clam-farming community. Concerns have focused on two issues: first, the transfer of leases that were provided to participants in aquaculture training programs, and second, concerns about competition, economic advantage and other issues associated with the small farmer versus the corporate farm. The first concern deals with individuals who were issued a free lease as part of a training program, and who subsequently transfer that lease to a corporation. This concern is based on the premise that transferring these leases to a business is not consistent with the training programs' intent to encourage local economic development by assisting displaced commercial fishermen.

The request includes the transfer of five leases, accounting for 16 acres, that were issued to training program participants. In the past, 18 leases that were initially issued to training program participants have been transferred in whole or in part to other entities. The transfers to NCI could have been approved similarly, except that the number of leases and the amount of acreage distinguish this action from other administrative transfers. The transfers to NCI constitute about 26 percent of the lease transfers in Levy County, and 22 percent of the transfers involving leases originally issued to training program participants.

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Two



Item 2, cont.

Staff's recommendation for approval takes into account that several options have been offered to local commercial fishermen and their families to assist them in obtaining leases. Two training programs have been offered and preference has been given to commercial fishermen and their families when lease sites have been available. Since most displaced fishermen have already been given the opportunity to apply for a lease, this request is not considered to be in direct conflict with the goal of assisting affected fishermen. Estimates indicate that only 24 of the initial 107 program participants are no longer leaseholders.

The second concern involves issues associated with big business versus small business. Some members of the clam farming industry are alarmed that a corporation would have advantages in the market that would be detrimental to small family producers. The transfer of 18 aquaculture leases, accounting for 42 acres, represents a unique and unprecedented request by a single corporate entity. These requests and current holdings by NCI officials bring the company's leaseholds to about 54 acres.

For the most part, economic advantage in the business world has not been a primary factor in approving or denying lease transfers. The DEP, recognizing the Board of Trustees' intent to assist displaced fishermen, has sought to encourage local economic development by providing alternative employment through shellfish farming. However, staff also recognizes that not everyone that participated in these training programs would be successful clam farmers, since failure is a realistic element in high-risk aquaculture ventures. Because this type of business venture is not for everyone, staff believes that it is in the state's best interest to allow non-producing leases to be transferred to other individuals or entities that would bring them into production.

Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code do not specifically address the issue of how much sovereign submerged land can be held by a single entity. Section 18-21 (2)(l) 8.e., F.A.C., applies to the size of single aquaculture lease parcels, but has not been applied to overall holdings or lease transfers. In this case, a single entity will hold multiple leases where the size of the individual leases will not exceed the limits provided, while the total amount of acreage held will exceed these limits. In the past, staff has recommended approval or denial based on the applicant's ability to develop all of the leases. In this case, staff has determined that NCI is capable of complying with its proposed business plan.

A consideration of the status of any local government comprehensive plans was not made for this item. The DEP has determined that the proposed actions are not subject to the local government planning process.

(See Attachment 2, Pages 1-52)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 3 USFWS Lease Modification/Land Exchange for Proposed Aquaculture Use Zone

REQUEST: Consideration of authorization to negotiate with the United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service to modify an existing lease by exchanging parcels of sovereign submerged lands and uplands for a parcel of submerged lands to establish an Aquaculture Use Zone.

COUNTY: Indian River

APPLICANT: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Three



Item 3, cont.

LOCATION: Section 32, Township 30 South, Range 39 East, near the City of Sebastian, in the Indian River, east of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway.

CONSIDERATION: The lease fees for proposed leases within the Aquaculture Use Zone represent (1) a base annual rent of $15.58 per acre or fraction thereof; and (2) an annual surcharge, representing $5 per acre or fraction thereof, for deposit in Marine Resource Conservation Trust Fund. Pursuant to section 370.16(4)(b), F. S., each applicant's lease fee shall be adjusted on January 1, 2000, and every five years thereafter, based upon the five year average change in the Consumer Price Index.

STAFF REMARKS: This request represents Phase II of a two-phase program to establish an "Aquaculture Use Zone" in Indian River County. This action is the culmination of cooperative efforts between the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, and the Indian River Board of County Commissioners. The proposed "Aquaculture Use Zone" is located within the present boundaries of the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge. This tract of submerged land was identified by the DEP and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and determined to be appropriate for aquacultural use. The proposed tract of submerged land provides the only opportunity for developing shellfish aquaculture in Indian River County. If approved, the Aquaculture Use Zone would become the key component in establishing a fisheries revitalization program to assist fishermen that were adversely affected by recent fishery restrictions and would promote local economic development.

Establishing the Aquaculture Use Zone will require modifying the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge's lease, which currently preempts about 4,640 acres. The proposed project has been divided into two phases: the completion of Phase I and Phase II will result in approximately 125 acres of submerged lands being designated for the Aquaculture Use Zone.

In Phase I of the project, the lease agreement with the wildlife refuge was modified to exchange 46.92 acres of submerged lands on an acre-for-acre basis. Four existing submerged land leases within the boundary of the refuge were exchanged for six new lease parcels occupying an equal number of acres within the Aquaculture Use Zone. The lease agreement with the wildlife refuge was amended and administered by the Division of State Lands, and six aquaculture leases were subsequently issued by the Division of Marine Resources.

Phase II of the project includes an additional tract of approximately 85 acres that will be subdivided into smaller individual aquaculture leases (two-acre parcels) that will occupy about 78 acres. The proposed modifications to the existing lease include exchanging a parcel of submerged lands currently held under lease by the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge for state-owned uplands and submerged lands that are contiguous with the refuge, including Pete's No. 3 and Birds mosquito control impoundments. Implementation of the Aquaculture Use Zone will require modifications to the refuge's current lease only, and no additional lands will be deeded or otherwise transferred to the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge as part of this action. The Division of State Lands will administer modifications to the lease agreement when negotiations have been completed.

In return for the submerged lands being removed from the wildlife refuge's lease, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service seeks the inclusion of certain properties that are not currently within the refuge's lease. In exchange for the submerged lands that will be included in the Aquaculture Use Zone, approximately 200 acres of uplands and submerged lands, including Pete's and Bird's mosquito control impoundments, will be included in the refuge's modified lease. This transaction would complete the refuge's efforts to acquire or lease all of the private and public property contiguous with the refuge, consolidate the refuge boundary, and facilitate management of the refuge. Additionally, the current lease would be modified to provide Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Four



Item 3, cont.

authority for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to enforce a "no access zone'' around Pelican Island. This "no access zone" would specifically include only those waters within a 125-meter radius around Pelican Island, and would not include other submerged lands or waters within the refuge's boundaries.

The negotiated lease agreement will be brought back before the Board of Trustees to approve all modifications before Phase II of the Aquaculture Use Zone is authorized. When the Aquaculture Use Zone has been designated, individual aquaculture leases will be issued to qualified applicants and include current terms and conditions for aquaculture leases.

Section 253.68, F.S., recognizes aquaculture as a practicable resource management alternative to produce marine aquaculture products, to protect and conserve natural resources, to reduce competition for natural stocks, and to augment and restore natural populations. Furthermore, section 253.68 (2)(b), F.S., declares that it shall be a policy of the state to foster aquaculture development when the aquaculture activity is consistent with the state resource management goals, environmental protection, proprietary interests, and the state aquaculture plan.

A consideration of the status of any local government comprehensive plans was not made for this item. The DEP has determined that the proposed actions are not subject to the local government planning process.

(See Attachment 3, Pages 1-37)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE TO MODIFY AN EXISTING LEASE BY EXCHANGING SOVEREIGN SUBMERGED LANDS AND UPLANDS FOR SUBMERGED LANDS TO ESTABLISH AN AQUACULTURE USE ZONE



Item 4 Rebecca Slaton Option Agreement/Florida Keys Ecosystem CARL Project

REQUEST:  Consideration of an option agreement to acquire 1.47 acres within the Florida Keys Ecosystem CARL project from Rebecca Slaton.

COUNTY:  Monroe

LOCATION:  Section 19, Township 66 South, Range 29 East

CONSIDERATION:  $13,300

APPRAISED BY

REVIEW Hrabko APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION

NO. PARCEL ACRES (05/18/98) VALUE PRICE DATE

908005 Slaton/3074 1.47 $13,300 $13,300 $13,300 150 days

after BOT

approval

STAFF REMARKS: The Florida Keys Ecosystem CARL project is ranked number 4 on the CARL Priority Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State Lands' (DSL) Land Acquisition Workplan. The project contains 7,033 acres, of which 1,216.22 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 5,815.31 acres or 83 percent of the project will remain to be acquired.

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Five



Item 4, cont.

On March 12, 1996, the Board of Trustees exercised its authority under section 259.041(1), F.S., to waive the normal appraisal procedures and to substitute other reasonably prudent procedures. This enabled the DSL to utilize approved appraised values that were based on land use regulations in effect as of January 1, 1996, in Monroe County.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing. In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the property or the proposed management of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing.

A title insurance policy, a survey, an environmental site evaluation and, if necessary, an environmental site assessment will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

The unique pine rocklands and hardwood hammocks of the Florida Keys, forests of West Indian plants that shelter several extremely rare animals, are being lost to the rapid development of these islands. The Florida Keys Ecosystem CARL project will protect all the significant unprotected hardwood hammocks left in the Keys and many rare plants and animals, including the Lower Keys marsh rabbit and the Key deer. It will also help protect the Outstanding Florida Waters of the Keys, the recreational and commercial fisheries, and the reefs around the islands, and will give residents and visitors more areas in which to enjoy the natural beauty of the Keys.

This property will be managed by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission for the conservation and preservation of the natural resources of the property.

This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 4, Pages 1-17)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 5 Kersey Purchase Agreement/Hrosso Option Agreement/Coupon Bight/Key Deer CARL Project

REQUEST: Consideration of a purchase agreement and an option agreement to acquire 9.47 acres within the Coupon Bight/Key Deer CARL project from Patricia M. Kersey and Marilyn R. Hrosso, respectively.

COUNTY: Monroe

LOCATION: Sections 23 and 26, Township 66 South, Range 29 East

CONSIDERATION: $486,000

APPRAISED BY CLOSING/

REVIEW Marr APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION

NO. PARCEL ACRES (10/02/98) VALUE PRICE DATES

908006 Kersey/5964 0.40 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 150 days after

BOT approval

Marr

(04/27/98)

908007 Hrosso 9.07 $485,000 $485,000 $436,000

9065/9067 9.47 $535,000 $486,000

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Six



Item 5, cont.

STAFF REMARKS: The Coupon Bight/Key Deer CARL project is ranked number 2 on the CARL Mega-Multiparcel Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State Lands' (DSL) Land Acquisition Workplan.  This project contains 1,827 acres, of which 656.11 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired.  After the Board of Trustees approves these agreements, 1,161.42 acres or 64 percent of the project will remain to be acquired.

On March 12, 1996, the Board of Trustees exercised its authority under section 259.041(1), F.S., to waive the normal appraisal procedures and to substitute other reasonably prudent procedures. This enabled the DSL to utilize approved appraised values that were based on land use regulations in effect as of January 1, 1996, in Monroe County.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing. In the event the commitments for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveal any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the properties or the proposed management of the properties, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing.

Title insurance policies, surveys, environmental site evaluations and, if necessary, environmental site assessments will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

The subtropical pine forests of rapidly developing Big Pine Key and the islands around it are the home of the endangered Key deer as well as of many Caribbean plants found nowhere else in the country. Rich coral reefs and other hardbottom communities flourish in the shallow water around the islands. The Coupon Bight/Key Deer CARL project will protect the remaining undeveloped land on Big Pine and No Name Keys, without which the Key deer will not survive; protect the water quality of the Coupon Bight Aquatic Preserve and the other waters surrounding the islands; and provide the public an area to appreciate the unique natural world of this part of Florida.

These parcels will be managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as part of the Key Deer National Wildlife Refuge.

These acquisitions are consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 5, Pages 1-35)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 6 Two Option Agreements/One Purchase Agreement/East Everglades CARL Project

REQUEST: Consideration of authorization to acquire 100 percent interest in 20.89 acres within the East Everglades CARL project from three separate owners.

COUNTY: Miami-Dade

LOCATION: Section 09, Township 52 South, Range 39 East; and Sections 04 and 18, Township 54 South, Range 39 East

CONSIDERATION: $170,700

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Seven



Item 6, cont.

STAFF REMARKS: The East Everglades CARL project is ranked number 3 on the Mega­Multiparcel CARL List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and is funded under the Division of State Lands' Land Acquisition Workplan. The area known as the East Coast Buffer covers 72,230 acres. Of this, 2,588 acres will be protected by mitigation and 29,646 acres are of a lower priority, including land owned by local governments and acres that may not need to be acquired. Of the remaining 39,996 acres proposed for acquisition, the South Florida Water Management District (District) previously acquired 16,899 acres. After the Board of Trustees approves these acquisitions, 23,076.11 acres or 58 percent of the area will remain to be acquired.

The East Coast Buffer consists of approximately 72,230 acres of marshes, reservoirs, and groundwater recharge areas in Palm Beach, Broward and Dade counties. However, the most significant aspect of the East Coast Buffer is its role in restoring the Everglades. In 1992, Congress authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) to conduct a restudy of the Central and Southern Florida Project. The reconnaissance report for this restudy was completed in 1994 and the COE incorporated the East Coast Buffer in its analysis, referring to the area as the "Water Preserve Areas".

The purpose of the East Coast Buffer/Water Preserve Areas is to: (1) increase storage and hold more water in the system by controlling seepage from the Everglades, thus restoring more natural Everglades hydropatterns; (2) capture and store excess stormwater currently discharged to coastal waters, thus retaining an important water supply source for both urban and natural systems; (3) provide a buffer between the natural and developed areas; (4) preserve and protect wetlands outside the publicly-owned Everglades; and (5) provide important transitional land uses between the natural and developed areas. East Coast Buffer/Water Preserve Areas may also enhance flood control in areas to the east of these lands. The East Coast Buffer lands are under intense development pressure in all counties. Therefore, immediate public acquisition is needed to preserve and enhance wetlands and preserve opportunities for the restoration of the Everglades ecosystem.

To implement this restoration, during the last decade the District has acquired over 16,000 acres at a cost of $119,000,000. In anticipation of the Board of Trustees' participation in this effort, the East Coast Buffer was added to the East Everglades CARL project on March 15, 1996. District funding is now limited but the District offered to take the lead in acquiring the property on behalf of the Board of Trustees. On December 8, 1998, the Board of Trustees authorized staff to enter into an acquisition agreement to acquire various ownerships located in the East Coast Buffer portion of the East Everglades CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(16), F.S., utilizing the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S. On June 15, 1995, the Board of Trustees approved the use of the District's procedures to allow the District to acquire lands to be held by the Board of Trustees. Since the land being acquired will be part of a federal project, federal acquisition procedures are being used.

On behalf of the District, The Nature Conservancy has acquired two options to purchase two parcels and the District has acquired an agreement for sale and purchase for one parcel, all at 100 percent of appraised value. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, the District shall be reimbursed for all costs associated with acquiring the three properties, including pre-acquisition and closing related costs. The Board of Trustees' purchase price will be 100 percent of the contract price negotiated by the District plus 100 percent of the cost incurred in the purchase of the properties. Title to the properties acquired will vest in the Board of Trustees.

As provided for in the acquisition agreement, the Governing Board of the District adopted Resolution 99-12 requesting the Board of Trustees' share of the purchase price for the three parcels, reimbursement of 100 percent of its pre-acquisition costs and reimbursement of 100 Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Eight



Item 6, cont.

percent of its closing costs. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, the pre-acquisition and closing costs will be reimbursed from CARL incidental expense funds. The District's resolution contains all of the assurances required by the acquisition agreement.

The East Coast Buffer portion of the East Everglades CARL project will be managed by the District in conjunction with COE Everglades restoration projects. As local sponsor for the restoration projects, the District is required to hold a title interest sufficient to meet COE certification requirements. While the COE would prefer the sponsor to hold fee title, section 259.101(3)(g), F.S., states that title to lands acquired with P2000 funds under the CARL program must vest in the Board of Trustees. The acquisition agreement includes a provision whereby the Board of Trustees will convey to the District an easement consistent with section 253.034(4), F.S., for any lands acquired under this agreement that are to become part of a COE approved Everglades restoration project. Department of Environmental Protection staff is currently working with the COE and the District to develop an easement sufficient for COE certification. The COE will require the easement to include a statement that the land interest will not be impaired during the life of the project and that the COE is granted an irrevocable right to enter the project lands for the purpose of constructing, inspecting, completing, operating, repairing, maintaining, replacing or rehabilitating the projects. In the event that the COE determines that fee title is required to meet certification requirements, statutes would need to be amended to permit entities other than the Board of Trustees to hold title to lands acquired with P2000 funds.

This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 6, Pages 1-25)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 7 Four Purchase Agreements/Save Our Everglades (Golden Gate Estates South) CARL Project

REQUEST:  Consideration of four purchase agreements to acquire 120 acres within the Save Our Everglades (Golden Gate Estates South) CARL project from Richard S. Fish, Sergio Arguez and Francisia Arguez, Michael Jay McAlhany, and Ronnie Sydney Klein.

COUNTY:  Collier

LOCATION:  Section 22, Township 50 South, Range 28 East

CONSIDERATION:  $336,000

APPRAISED BY

REVIEW PARCEL/ Hettema APPROVED PURCHASE CLOSING

NO. OWNER ACRES (01/12/99) VALUE PRICE DATE

908001 Fish 20 $ 56,000 $ 56,000 $ 56,000 150 days after

908002 Arguez 20 $ 56,000 $ 56,000 $ 56,000 BOT approval

908003 McAlhany 60 $168,000 $168,000 $168,000

908004 Klein 20 $ 56,000 $ 56,000 $ 56,000

120 $336,000 $336,000

STAFF REMARKS: The Save Our Everglades CARL project is ranked number 4 on the CARL Mega-Multiparcel Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State Lands' Land Acquisition Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Nine



Item 7, cont.

Workplan. The project contains 222,691 acres, of which 198,859.75 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves these agreements, 23,711.25 acres or 11 percent of the project will remain to be acquired.

These properties are being acquired utilizing federal acquisition procedures as a condition of the award of a $25 million Farm Bill grant from the U.S. Department of Interior to the Department of Environmental Protection for the purchase of lands within the Save Our Everglades (Golden Gate Estates South) CARL project.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.  In the event the commitments for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveal any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the properties or the proposed management of the properties, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing.

Title insurance policies, surveys, environmental site evaluations and, if necessary, environmental site assessments will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

West of the huge sawgrass marsh of the central Everglades spreads a landscape of cypress swamps, marshes, slash-pine flatwoods, and tropical hammocks, through which water slowly flows to the mangrove swamps of the Ten Thousand Islands. The Save Our Everglades CARL project will conserve three large pieces of this landscape, connecting and extending existing conservation lands, helping to save the last of the Florida panthers and a host of other rare animals and tropical plants, preserving the flow of water to the rich estuaries of the Gulf coast, and allowing the public to enjoy this unique landscape for years to come.

These properties will be managed by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry as a part of the Picayune Strand State Forest.

These acquisitions are consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 7, Pages 1-15)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 8 Twelve Option Agreements/Three Purchase Agreements/Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed CARL Project

REQUEST: Consideration of authorization to acquire 100 percent interest in 95 acres within the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed CARL project from fifteen separate owners.

COUNTY: Lee

LOCATION: Sections 25 through 27, 35 and 36, Township 47 South, Range 26 East

CONSIDERATION: $166,000

STAFF REMARKS: The Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) CARL project is ranked number 11 on the CARL Bargain\Shared Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and qualifies for purchase under the Division of State Lands' Land Acquisition Workplan. The project contains 59,008 acres, of which 20,055 acres have Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Ten



Item 8, cont.

been acquired by the South Florida Water Management District (District) and Lee County, and 1,179.5 acres have been acquired by or are under contract to the Board of Trustees. After the Board of Trustees approves these acquisitions, 37,678.5 acres or 64 percent of this project will remain to be acquired.

When the CREW project was added to the CARL list in 1991, a limit was placed on the CARL involvement to encourage local participation in the project. The project was initially planned to be a four party project with equal participation by Lee and Collier counties, the District and the Board of Trustees. To encourage this participation, the Land Acquisition Advisory Council (LAAC) placed both a geographical and financial restriction on the CARL participation in the project. Based on the fact that the Board of Trustees' share of the overall purchase was to be 25 percent and the initial project cost estimate was $40 million, a $10 million "cap" was imposed and acquisition efforts were limited to the Camp Keis Strand Corridor.

While both Lee County and the District began acquiring land within the project, participation by the Division of State Lands and Collier County was stalled. In the CARL acquisition area (Camp Keis Strand), the Collier family was the largest owner. They were pursuing an exchange with the federal government and were unwilling to consider a sale to the Board of Trustees while these efforts were underway. Collier County's bond referendum did not pass and it has been unable to contribute to the project.

On November 20, 1992, the LAAC modified the project design to remove the geographical restriction (Camp Keis Strand) but maintained the $10 million cap. The LAAC also limited the CARL match to acquisitions made by the District after the date of the LAAC meeting. Following this decision, staff began working with the District to identify lands purchased that would qualify for the CARL match. Various options to pursue cooperative purchases were considered.

In 1994, the legislature enacted section 259.041, F.S., which provided the authority to adopt District procedures for joint acquisitions. On June 27, 1995, the Board of Trustees authorized staff to enter into an acquisition agreement with the District to acquire various ownerships located within the CREW CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(16), F.S., utilizing the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S. At the time the original agreement was entered into, the LAAC-imposed cap on funding was still in effect. The District had already made some purchases in the project and requested that the Board of Trustees match the District's contribution by paying 100 percent of the cost until the Board of Trustees' expenditures equaled the District's. However, since the estimated cost of the parcels remaining to be acquired in the project exceeded $20 million, a 50/50 match on each succeeding acquisition would exhaust the Board of Trustees' funding limit of $10 million before the project acquisition was completed. For this reason, a 50/50 agreement was recommended and approved.

On October 30, 1995, the LAAC expanded the project boundary, eliminated the $10 million cap and designated the project a shared acquisition with the District. As a shared acquisition, the District and the Board of Trustees are each expected to spend the same amount in acquiring land within the project. Since the District has already made some purchases for which it would be credited, staff agreed that it would be appropriate for the Board of Trustees to match those purchases called for under the acquisition agreement. Therefore, the acquisition agreement was amended to provide that the Board of Trustees purchase $13,360,000 worth of land in the project at its sole cost and expense before the 50/50 shared acquisitions will resume. The District has provided documentation, acceptable to the Division of State Lands, establishing the District's expenditure in this project. Following the Board of Trustees' authorization of these acquisitions, $2,040,731 worth of land will have been purchased by the Board of Trustees towards matching the District's purchases in this project. The remaining matching balance will be $11,319,269.

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Eleven



Item 8, cont.

On behalf of the District, The Nature Conservancy has acquired twelve options to purchase thirteen parcels and the District has acquired three agreements for sale and purchase, all at 100 percent of appraised value. Pursuant to the terms of the amended acquisition agreement, the District shall be reimbursed for all costs associated with acquiring the twelve properties, including pre-acquisition and closing related costs. The Board of Trustees' purchase price will be 100 percent of the contract price negotiated by the District plus 100 percent of the cost incurred in the purchase of the properties. Title to the properties acquired will vest in the Board of Trustees.

As provided for in the amended acquisition agreement, the Governing Board of the District adopted Resolutions 99-27 and 99-28 requesting the Board of Trustees' share of the purchase price for the sixteen parcels, reimbursement of 100 percent of its pre-acquisition and reimbursement of 100 percent of its closing costs. Pursuant to the amended acquisition agreement, the pre-acquisition and closing costs will be reimbursed from CARL incidental expense funds. The District's resolutions contain all of the assurances required by the amended acquisition agreement.

These properties will be managed by the District as a conservation and preservation area with passive public use.

These acquisitions are consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 8, Pages 1-36)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL


Item 9 Robinson Option Agreement/Survey Waiver/Shell Island Project

REQUEST:  Consideration of (1) an option agreement to acquire 0.14 acre within the Shell Island Division of Recreation and Parks' Additions and Inholdings project from Jerry E. Robinson and Joyce Jean Robinson; and (2) a request for survey waiver.

COUNTY:  Bay

LOCATION:  Section 31, Township 04 South, Range 14 West

CONSIDERATION:  $13,000

APPRAISED BY

REVIEW Presley APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION

NO. PARCEL ACRES (05/31/96) VALUE PRICE DATE

908008 Robinson/M 0.14 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 150 days

after BOT

approval

STAFF REMARKS: The Shell Island project has been identified on the Division of Recreation and Parks' Additions and Inholdings List. This agreement was negotiated by the Division of State Lands (DSL) on behalf of the Division of Recreation and Parks (DRP) under the State Parks Additions and Inholdings Preservation 2000 program. The project contains 12 acres, of which 3.17 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 8.69 acres or 72 percent of the project will remain to be acquired.

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Twelve



Item 9, cont.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.  In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the property or the proposed management of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing. The property is on an island and can only be accessed over and across sovereignty land.

Staff requests that the Board of Trustees, pursuant to its authority under section 259.041(1), F.S., waive any portions of chapter 259, F.S., and any applicable rule or policy that may require a survey on this parcel. It is the opinion of the Bureau of Survey and Mapping that available boundary information is sufficient to reasonably protect the public's interest.

While this parcel is being recommended for a waiver of survey at this time, should the title commitment reveal a substantive surveying or surveying related issue which impacts the parcel, a certified survey will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing. In the event a full survey is waived, a professional land surveyor will inspect the property for any visible evidence of improvements or potential boundary issues. In cooperation with the managing agency, the DSL will acquire any special purpose survey work necessary for the effective management of this property.

A title insurance policy, an environmental site evaluation and, if necessary, an environmental site assessment will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

This property will be managed by the DRP as an addition to the St. Andrews State Recreational Area.

This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201 (10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 9, Pages 1-24)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 10 The Nature Conservancy, Inc., Assignment of Option Agreement/Tate's Hell State Forest Project

REQUEST: Consideration of the acceptance of the assignment of an option agreement to acquire 13,252 acres within the Tate's Hell State Forest Additions and Inholdings project by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry under the Preservation 2000 program from The Nature Conservancy, Inc.

COUNTIES: Liberty and Franklin

APPLICANT: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry

LOCATION: Sections 22 through 27 and 34 through 36, Township 05 South, Range 07 West; and Sections 19 through 22 and 27 through 34, Township 05 South, Range 06 West

CONSIDERATION: $9,942,125 ($9,867,125 for the acquisition; $75,000 for the purchase of the option agreement)

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Thirteen



Item 10, cont.

APPRAISED BY

REVIEW PARCEL Ryan Diskin APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION

NO. NAME ACRES (12/08/98) (12/08/98) VALUE PRICE DATE

908009 St. Joe 13,252* $10,225,000 $9,617,000 $10,141,000 $9,867,125 May 31, 1999

(Sumatra)

*Acreage amount was revised on April 8, 1999.

Approved value was revised on April 8, 1999, due to a decrease in acreage.

STAFF REMARKS: This acquisition was negotiated by The Nature Conservancy, Inc. (TNC) for the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry (DOF) under its Preservation 2000 Additions and Inholdings program. The Tate's Hell State Forest Additions and Inholdings project contains 13,252 acres. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, the project will be complete.

Pursuant to a multi-party agreement entered into between the Division of State Lands (DSL), DOF and TNC, TNC has acquired an option to purchase this 13,252-acre parcel from St. Joe Timberland Co., Inc., (St. Joe), a Florida corporation. After this acquisition is approved, the Board of Trustees will acquire the option from TNC for $75,000, which represents agreed upon compensation to TNC for overhead associated with acquiring the option. The assignment of option agreement provides that payment to TNC is contingent upon the Board of Trustees successfully acquiring the property from the owner. The assignment of option agreement further provides that in no event will the purchase price for the option and the purchase price of the property exceed the DSL approved value of the property.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied prior to the time of closing. Approximately 5,832 acres of the property are encumbered by outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests and leases. The outstanding oil, gas and mineral interest is a 50 percent reservation that was created in December 1952, in favor of C. K. and Margaret Wall and T. A. and Mary M. Liefield, to run indefinitely. C. K. and Margaret Wall conveyed their 25 percent interest to the Florida State University Foundation on October 23, 1973. The oil and gas leases were created on May 7, 1951, in favor of Humble Oil and Refining Company, and on August 15, 1973, in favor of Exxon Corporation, and on April 19, 1978, in favor of Southern Oil Exploration, Inc., all to run for a period of ten years. Based on available title information, the leases appear to have expired. The Bureau of Geology has indicated that three oil test wells were drilled near the subject property and all were abandoned as dry wells. The Bureau of Geology also indicates that it does not believe there is much potential for industrial mineral development at this site, but that the overlying sands and clayey sands might be used as fill material. The appraisers were aware of the outstanding interests and took them into consideration when determining the value of the property. The DOF, the future managing agency, has determined that the property can be effectively managed subject to the outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests. There is a hunting lease on the property that will be terminated prior to closing. In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the property or the proposed management of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing.

A title insurance policy, an environmental site assessment and a survey will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

This property, which will be managed by the DOF as part of Tate's Hell State Forest, is adjacent to the Tate's Hell State Forest and will consolidate state forest boundaries in the area, provide access, and improve overall management of the forest. This property is also bounded on the west and the north by the Apalachicola National Forest. This purchase connects hydrologic and wildlife corridors between state and federal forests. The property will be Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Fourteen



Item 10, cont.

managed for natural resource conservation and outdoor recreation activities under a multiple-use management regime.

This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 10, Pages 1-46)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 11 Voluntary Dismissal of Petition for Declaratory Statement/Seminole County

DEFERRED FROM THE MARCH 23, 1999, AGENDA

DEFERRED FROM THE FEBRUARY 9, 1999, AGENDA

DEFERRED FROM THE JANUARY 26, 1999, AGENDA

REQUEST: Consideration of notification of voluntary dismissal of a Petition for Declaratory Statement.

COUNTY: Seminole

STAFF REMARKS: On September 24, 1998, Seminole County (County) filed a Petition for Declaratory Statement under section 120.565, F.S., requesting that the Board of Trustees answer the following questions: (1) whether "the lands and waters known as Clifton Springs and its associated waterways are lands and/or waters of the State subject to the County's enforcement powers under section 253.05, Florida Statutes. . . "; and (2) whether, in light of the petition, the Board of Trustees "will seek to enforce any of the State's rights under section 253.04, Florida Statutes." Petitioner alleges that under section 253.05, F.S., it has the duty to see that lands owned by the state shall not be the object of damage, trespass, depredation, or unlawful use. (The petition does not allege that any such violations of state law are occurring at Clifton Springs.) Petitioner further alleges that it has an interest in public lands for the use and benefit of the County's citizens and that it owns a fish camp parcel proximate to and potentially influenced by Clifton Springs. It also alleges an undefined "potential threat" to Lake Jesup (a sovereign lake), to the Sulphur Springs Apphaostracon (snail), and to the Great Leather Fern.

The County's petition was scheduled for consideration by the Board of Trustees at its meeting held on January 26, 1999, but was deferred first to February 9, 1999; then to March 23, 1999; and finally to May 11, 1999. On April 27, 1999, the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners voted to voluntarily dismiss its petition and filed with the Department of Environmental Protection "Petitioner, Seminole County's, Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Petition for Declaratory Statement." The Department of Environmental Protection is accordingly notifying the Board of Trustees that the petition has been voluntarily dismissed.

(See Attachment 11, Pages 1-9)

RECOMMEND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PETITION FOR DECLARATORY STATEMENT

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Fifteen



Item 12 Marina Bay Club, Ltd., Quitclaim Deed

REQUEST: Consideration of a request to issue of a quitclaim deed to permit the reclamation of a 0.061-acre (2,659 square-foot) parcel of privately-owned land lost as a result of artificial erosion and avulsion.

COUNTY: Dade

APPLICANT: Marina Bay Club, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

LOCATION: Section 11, Township 52 South, Range 42 East

CONSIDERATION: $39,885, as calculated under the provisions of section 18-21.019, F.A.C.

STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is requesting to purchase lands lost as a result of artificial erosion and avulsion. The subject parcel has a collapsed bulkhead and the presence of adjacent bulkheads and secondary wave actions are intensifying the damage.

The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has determined that all of the criteria of section 18-21.019, F.A.C., have been met. This includes: proof of ownership, documentation supporting the location of the mean high water line prior to and after artificial erosion, documentation demonstrating the adjacent shoreline is bulkheaded or armored, a legal description showing the quantity of land does not exceed one-half acre, the tax assessed value from the county property appraiser's records, the sale is in the public interest, a copy of the DEP regulatory permit, and the lands are not located within an aquatic preserve.

The sale is in the public interest since the deed will contain language reserving lateral public access. Also, the presence of the adjacent bulkheads might cause a continued deterioration of the subject parcel and ultimately affect the adjoining lots.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item. The DEP has determined that the proposed action is not subject to the local government planning process.

(See Attachment 12, Pages 1-21)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 13 Thomas Overstreet Quitclaim Deed

REQUEST: Consideration of request to issue of a quitclaim deed for the Board of Trustees' interest in a 1.7-acre (74,052 square-foot) parcel, more or less, of possibly filled sovereignty submerged lake bottom.

COUNTY: Pinellas

APPLICANT: Thomas Overstreet

LOCATION: Section 08, Township 27 South, Range 16 East

CONSIDERATION: $2,200 representing the (1) current appraised value, as approved by the Bureau of Appraisal, of the possibly filled sovereignty submerged lake bottom land as it existed prior to filling; and (2) application fee. Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Sixteen



Item 13, cont.

STAFF REMARKS: The applicant is proposing to purchase the Board of Trustees' interest in a parcel of possibly filled land in Lake Tarpon.

On June 19, 1998, the Division of State Lands (DSL) was contacted by a title company inquiring whether the state had any title interest in a ditch leading to Lake Tarpon. The ditch is located on a parcel of land that includes a peninsula occupied by a single-family residence. The current owner has placed the property on the market. There have been several offers made but the sale is pending upon the resolution of the title issue.

The DSL researched title records on file in its Title and Land Records Section, but could find no evidence that the uplands were owned by the Board of Trustees. The applicant has provided a deed indicating their riparian ownership to the lake. Since the peninsula is surrounded by the waters of Lake Tarpon, a navigable, state-owned waterbody, the DSL reviewed historical maps. These maps indicate that sometime after 1943, the shoreline dramatically changed, resulting in the appearance of additional lands. While no evidence has been discovered to show what actually happened, one possible explanation is that the area was illegally filled by a previous owner. Another possible explanation is that the older maps, which show less land, depict the shoreline at a time when the water level in Lake Tarpon was higher and the peninsula may have been partially submerged. If the land was illegally filled, then technically it still belongs to the Board of Trustees. Since the DSL could not determine what had happened, it was not able to affirmatively tell the title company or the landowner that the state had no interest in the property.

The title company could not rely on this response for insurance purposes. The title company then submitted a current survey, but could not provide historic information to show that the added lands were caused by reasons other than fill. The DSL located and acquired historic aerial photographs from Pinellas County. The approximate extent of added land was then digitized from the aerial photography and calculated to be 1.7 acres. The 1.7 acres was determined by using the current shoreline location and overlaying a historic 1942 aerial photograph. This calculation is approximate since it is possible that these shoreline photographs were taken at different water levels. This information was sent to the landowner for his review.

The landowner asserted that, even if the lands were filled, it would have been prior to 1951 and therefore eligible for a Butler Act disclaimer. The Butler Act, however, does not pertain to isolated non-tidal lakes such as Lake Tarpon. The landowner also argued that if the lands were filled sovereignty submerged lands, they could be purchased under section 253.12(6), F.S., at the current appraised value prior to filling. The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has determined that this statute does not pertain to isolated lakes. Article X, Section 11 of the Florida Constitution states that sale of sovereignty submerged lands may be authorized by law but only when in the public interest. In an effort to help the landowner resolve his title issues, DEP suggested one option might be for him to purchase these lands and obtain a quitclaim deed from the Board of Trustees. He agreed with this in lieu of a quiet title action. DEP believes that the proposed conveyance is in the public interest in light of the following: the parcel does not lend itself to public use, there is no significant resource value (developed, maintained residential site); the liability of managing a small, isolated remnant parcel; cost for restoration; cost and uncertainty of results through litigation; clearing of title to a parcel of land filled many years prior to the purchase and occupation of current owner; and elimination of this cloud on the title for future owners.

Although the Board of Trustees, under section 253.03 (1), F.S., has the authority to dispose of filled formerly sovereignty lands, there are no guidelines in either the statutes or the Board of Trustees' rules to determine the amount to charge for such a conveyance.

Were the Butler Act to apply, a disclaimer could be issued for no consideration other than an application fee of $500. However, the Butler Act is not applicable in isolated, non-tidal lakes. Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Seventeen



Item 13, cont.

Under section 253.12 (6), F.S., the Board of Trustees may convey lands filled prior to June 11, 1957, for an amount equal to their current value as though not filled. Again, DEP does not believe this provision is applicable unless the lands were subject to the Butler Act. Finally, section 18-21.013, F.A.C. provides formulas to be considered when conveying lands filled after June 11, 1957. This provision is not applicable since the lands were filled prior to 1957 and this rule does not pertain to isolated lakes according to DEP.

To bring this matter to conclusion, DEP recommends that the Board of Trustees clear the applicant's title by issuing a quitclaim deed and conveying the Board of Trustees' interest in the property. DEP also recommends that the Board of Trustees charge a nominal fee for the conveyance since (1) even if the land was illegally filled, the applicant did not do it; (2) even if the land was illegally filled, it was filled prior to 1957; and (3) DEP has no affirmative proof that the land was filled. DEP recommends and the applicant has agreed to pay $2,200 which represents the current value of the land in its unfilled state plus an application fee.

In accordance with section 253.115, F.S., the requested conveyance was advertised and no objections were received.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item. The DEP has determined that the proposed action is not subject to the local government planning process.

(See Attachment 13, Pages 1-10)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 14 63rd Street Associates, Ltd., Release of Restrictions/Conveyance

DEFERRED FROM THE APRIL 13, 1999 AGENDA

REQUEST: Consideration of a request to (1) release the restrictions contained in Dedication No. 23589 (1429-13); and (2) convey 2.77 acres of filled formerly sovereignty submerged lands in Dade County to 63rd Street Associates, Ltd.

COUNTY: Dade

Dedication No. 23589 (1429-13)

Deed No. 30241 (4868-13)

APPLICANT: 63rd Street Associates, Ltd.

LOCATION: Sections 11 and 14, Township 53 South, Range 42 East

CONSIDERATION: Appraised market value, to be deposited in the Internal Improvement Trust Fund

STAFF REMARKS: On September 17, 1963, the Board of Trustees approved the dedication of 2.77 acres of submerged land in Indian Creek to St. Francis Hospital, Inc., (St. Francis) by Dedication No. 23589 (1429-13). Use of the property was restricted to a vehicular parking lot under supervision of and to serve the hospital. The dedication further specified that in the event St. Francis or its successors failed to use said land for said purpose and for a period of three consecutive years shall fail and neglect to maintain and use the same for said purposes, or if the said land shall be used for any purpose not herein specifically authorized, the dedication Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Eighteen



Item 14, cont.

herein shall, at the option of said Trustees, be subject to revocation upon sixty days notice in writing by the Trustees to St. Francis. The submerged lands were subsequently filled and used for a parking lot. In February 1999, the filled parcel and adjacent privately-owned land on which the hospital is located were purchased by 63rd Street Associates, Ltd., (Developer). The Developer proposes to use the former hospital site for commercial and residential purposes. To do so requires release of the restrictions from the dedication. Since dedications do not convey fee title, the Developer must also purchase the 2.77-acre parcel from the Board of Trustees.

Pursuant to section 18-2.018(3)(e)5., F.A.C., deed or dedication restrictions or reverters shall be released to the record owner(s) if the Board of Trustees determines that there is no longer any present or future public purpose for retaining them and that the affected parcel contains no fragile environmental, historical, archaeological or recreational resources which would require protection through continued enforcement of the restrictions or reverter. State agencies and the county were notified of the application. No objections were received, and no agency expressed any interest in managing this parcel or gave any reason for maintaining state ownership of the parcel.

Pursuant to section 18-21.013(1), F.A.C., applications to purchase lands riparian to uplands may be made by the riparian owners only. The Developer is the upland riparian owner.

Pursuant to section 253.115(5)(b), F.S., the notice and publication requirements of section 253.115, F.S., do not apply to any conveyance of land lying landward of the line of mean high water, which land does not exceed five acres in area.

Pursuant to section 253.12(2)(a), F.S., the Board of Trustees may sell submerged lands if determined by the Board of Trustees to be in the public interest. Staff believes that the proposed conveyance is in the public interest in light of the following: (1) it would not be economically feasible to restore the land to its previously unfilled state; (2) because the parcel has been filled and functions as a parking lot, it has no natural resource value; (3) the only access to the parcel, other than by water, is across the adjacent, privately-owned parcel, making management of the parcel problematic; (4) no agency has identified a public use for the property; and (5) if no other agency is willing to assume responsibility for the parcel, administrative and management costs would have to be born by the Department of Environmental Protection.

Pursuant to section 253.12(2)(b)3., F.S., the Board of Trustees may convey submerged lands to an applicant who does not have before the Board of Trustees an application for a permit to dredge or fill lands if, as a condition of the conveyance, dredging is prohibited except for navigation purposes. The quitclaim deed includes a provision restricting dredging, except for navigation purposes. In the event a need for dredging within the 2.77-acre parcel arises in the future, the applicant would be required to submit to the Board of Trustees a request for modification of the restrictions contained in Deed No. 30241 (4868-13).

If the release and subsequent conveyance are approved by the Board of Trustees, the Department of Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands will contract for an appraisal of the property. The Developer is prepared to pay the current appraised market value for the land.

During the course of reviewing the maps and survey for the filled land, a scriveners error was noted. The parcel is located in sections 11 and 14, not just section 11. The legal description in the proposed Release of Restrictions mirrors the legal description in the original dedication; however, the legal description in the deed has been corrected to reflect the additional section.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item. The Department of Environmental Protection has determined that the proposed action is not subject to the local government planning process. Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Nineteen



Item 14, cont.

(See Attachment 14, Pages 1-15)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 15 University of Florida Hotel and Conference Center Leasehold Interest Encumbrance/Nondisturbance Agreement/Estoppel Certificate

REQUEST: Consideration of (1) a proposal to encumber a leasehold interest in order to obtain financing to construct the University of Florida Hotel and Conference Center; and (2) a request for approval of a nondisturbance agreement and estoppel certificate.

COUNTY: Alachua

APPLICANTS: Florida Board of Regents, Florida Conference Center Associates, Inc., and SouthTrust Bank, National Association

LOCATION: Sections 08 and 09, Township 28 South, Range 18 East

REMARKS: The Board of Regents leases the University of Florida campus under Board of Trustees Lease Number 2734. On September 10, 1996, the Board of Trustees approved a sublease between the Board of Regents and Florida Conference Center Associates, Inc., (Associates) for the purpose of constructing and operating a conference center and hotel. Associates has arranged to obtain construction financing from SouthTrust Bank, National Association (Lender). To obtain the loan, the Lender has requested a nondisturbance agreement and estoppel certificate from the Board of Trustees and the Board of Regents. The nondisturbance agreement and estoppel certificate establish for the proposed lender that the current lease and sublease are in good standing. Associates has entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement whereby, following construction, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (Purchaser) will acquire the hotel and conference center, the sublease, and Associates' interest in the land. The nondisturbance agreement and estoppel certificate also establish that the Board of Trustees and Board of Regents recognize and authorize the assignment by Associates to Purchaser. The form of the agreement and certificate is being presented to the Board of Trustees because approval of proposals to encumber leasehold interests with mortgages or financing arrangements has not been delegated. Staff has reviewed the nondisturbance agreement and estoppel certificate and determined that the statements made are accurate with regard to the existing lease and sublease.

In the event of termination of the sublease due to default by Associates or its successor, the Lender shall have the option of obtaining a new sublessee, subject to the approval of the Board of Regents.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item. The Department of Environmental Protection has determined that the conditions of financing arrangements are not subject to the local government planning process.

Copies of the Primary Lease Agreement, Sublease Agreement and Purchase and Sale Agreement have been submitted to the Attorney General's Office for review purposes.

(See Attachment 15, Pages 1-25)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Twenty



Item 16 Chapter 259, F.S. Acquisition Program Recommendations

REQUEST: Consideration of recommendations to improve the operational efficiency and effectiveness of the chapter 259, F.S. acquisition program.

LOCATION: Statewide

APPLICANT: Department of Environmental Protection

STAFF REMARKS: At the February 9, 1999 Cabinet Meeting the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) presented the annual Conservation And Recreation Lands (CARL) / Preservation 2000 (P-2000) report. During this Cabinet Meeting several questions and concerns were voiced by individual cabinet members with respect to the CARL / P-2000 acquisition process. In response to these questions and concerns, Secretary Green recommended that the Division of State Lands provide the Board of Trustees a detailed briefing on the CARL/P-2000 acquisition process.

On March 9, 1999, DEP, Division of State Lands, gave the Board of Trustees a briefing on the mechanics of DEP's P-2000 land acquisition process. At the conclusion of the briefing five suggested areas for improvements were presented. These five suggestions were:

  1. Do we need to review every appraisal?
  1. Do we need to negotiate every acquisition?
  2. Does the Board of Trustees need to review every contract?
  3. Do we have to get "legal" marketable title on every parcel?
  4. Can we move some tasks to post closing? (shifting the burden from the seller to the state)

In addition, Governor Bush recommended that DEP consider developing some type of incentive program for sellers in order to help improve the negotiation success rate.

In order to address the questions presented by DEP and the suggestion by the Governor, staff has generated a set of detailed recommendations for consideration by the Board of Trustees. Staff believes that the implementation of these recommendations will significantly shorten the timelines associated with the majority of the acquisitions and increase DEP's negotiation success rate.

In summary these recommendations are:

  1. Institute a process whereby appraisals valued at $500,000 or less are reviewed on a selected basis.
  2. Obtain only one appraisal on parcels where the value is anticipated to be between $500,000 and $1,000,000.
  3. Delegate authority to DEP to approve all contracts for purchases under chapter 259, F.S., valued at less than $1,000,000.
  4. Streamline the closing process with respect to marketable title and associated performance by the land owner.
  5. Allow DEP to share appraisals when maximum offers have been made.
  6. Consider on a case by case basis, a monetary incentive program to increase the success rate of acquisitions.

 

DEP has prepared a detailed report with specific recommendations that is attached as backup to this agenda item and is asking the Board of Trustees to consider and approve those recommendations.

Board of Trustees

Agenda - May 11, 1999 Page Twenty-one



Item 16, cont.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item.

(See Attachment 16, Pages 1-15)

RECOMMEND APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IN THE ATTACHED REPORT