|
PART ONE: BACKGROUND, APPLICABILITY, AND OVERVIEW |
PART TWO: MATRIX OF COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS |
PART THREE: COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS |
PART FOUR: STATE PROJECT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS |
PART FIVE: INTERNAL CONTROLS |
PART SIX: GUIDANCE FOR AUDITING PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE COMPLIANCE SUPPLEMENT |
APPENDIX A: LIST OF CHANGES
PART ONE - Background,
Applicability and Overview
Background
The State Projects Compliance Supplement (Supplement) was developed pursuant to Section
215.97(3)(c), Florida Statutes, which provides that the Executive Office of the
Governor (EOG) is responsible for coordinating the initial preparation and subsequent
revisions of the Supplement after consultation with the Comptroller and all state
agencies that award state financial assistance to nonstate entities. This Supplement
serves to identify important compliance requirements, which the state expects to be
considered as part of the state single audit. Without the Supplement, auditors would
need to research many laws and rules for each project under audit to determine which
compliance requirements are important to the state and could have a direct and material
effect on a project. Providing this Supplement is an efficient and cost effective
approach to performing this research. For the projects contained herein, the
Supplement provides a source of information for auditors to understand the state
project's objectives, procedures, and compliance requirements relevant to the audit as
well as audit objectives and suggested audit procedures for determining compliance with
these requirements. The Supplement also provides guidance to assist auditors in
determining compliance requirements relevant to audit, audit objectives, and suggested
audit procedures for projects not included herein.
State agencies are
responsible to annually inform the EOG of any updates needed to this Supplement. This
responsibility includes ensuring that project objectives, procedures, and compliance
requirements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on these
individual state projects, are provided to the EOG for inclusion in this Supplement. The
agency project requirements are included in Part Four of this Supplement. These
individual sections can be updated or replaced as state projects change, and sections
will be added for additional projects once the objectives, procedures, and compliance
requirements relevant to the project are written.
Applicability
Auditors shall consider this Supplement and the referenced laws, rules, and other
guidelines in determining the compliance requirements that could have a direct and
material effect on the projects included herein. Use of this Supplement is
mandatory, and accordingly, adherence to this Supplement satisfies the requirements of
Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. For projects not included in this Supplement, the
auditor is to follow the guidance in Part Six and use the types of compliance
requirements in Part Three to identify the applicable compliance requirements which
could have a direct and material effect on the project.
State agencies are responsible to annually inform the
EOG of any updates needed to this Supplement. However, auditors should recognize that
laws and rules change periodically and that delays will occur between such changes and
revisions to this Supplement. Moreover, auditors should recognize that there may be
provisions of contracts or grant agreements that are not specified in law or rule, and
therefore, the specifics of such may not be included in the Supplement. Accordingly, the
auditor should perform reasonable procedures to ensure that compliance requirements are
current and to determine whether there are any additional provisions of contracts and
grant agreements that should be covered by the audit. Reasonable procedures would
include inquiry of nonstate entity management and review of the contacts and grant
agreements for projects selected for testing (major projects).
Because the suggested audit procedures are written to enable application to many
different projects administered by many different entities, they are necessarily
general in nature. Auditor judgment will be necessary to determine whether the
suggested audit procedures are sufficient to achieve the stated audit objectives or
whether additional or alternative audit procedures are needed. Therefore, the auditor
should not consider this Supplement to be a "safe harbor" for identifying the audit
procedures to apply in a particular engagement. However, the auditor can consider
this Supplement a "safe harbor" for identification of compliance requirements to be
tested for the projects included herein if, as discussed above, the auditor performs
reasonable procedures to ensure that the requirements in the Supplement are current
and to determine whether there are any additional provisions of contracts and grant
agreements that should be covered by the audit.
Overview
Matrix of Compliance Requirements (Part Two)
The Matrix of Compliance Requirements (Matrix) identifies the state projects and
compliance requirements addressed by the Supplement, and associates the projects with
the applicable compliance requirements. The Matrix also identifies the applicable
state agency and the Catalog of State Financial Assistance (CSFA) number for each
project included in this Supplement.
Compliance Requirements (Part Three)
Part Three lists and describes the 10 types of compliance requirements and, except for
Special Tests and Provisions, the related audit objectives that the auditor shall
consider in every audit conducted under Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. Suggested
audit procedures are also provided to assist the auditor in planning and performing
tests of nonstate entity compliance with the requirements of state projects. Auditor
judgment will be necessary to determine whether the suggested audit procedures are
sufficient to achieve the stated audit objectives and whether additional or alternative
audit procedures are needed. Determining the nature, timing, and extent of the audit
procedures necessary to meet the audit objectives is the auditor's responsibility.
The compliance requirements for Special Tests and Provisions are unique to each state
project; therefore, compliance requirements, audit objectives, and suggested audit
procedures for Special Tests and Provisions are not included in Part Three.
Because of the diversity of systems in place among nonstate entities, Part Three does
not include suggested audit procedures to test internal control. The auditor must
determine appropriate procedures to test internal control on a case-by-case basis
considering factors such as the nonstate entity's internal control, the compliance
requirements, the audit objectives for compliance, the auditor's assessment of control
risk, and the audit requirement to test internal control as prescribed by
Section 215.97(8), Florida Statutes. However, see Internal Controls
(Part Five) below.
State Project Compliance Requirements (Part Four)
For each state project included, Part Four discusses project objectives, procedures,
and compliance requirements that are specific to the project. With the exception of
Special Tests and Provisions, the auditor shall refer to Part Three for the audit
objectives and suggested audit procedures that pertain to the compliance requirements
associated with the projects. Since Special Tests and Provisions are unique to the
project, the audit objectives and suggested audit procedures for the project are
included in Part Four.
The description of the project's procedures is general in nature. Some projects may
operate somewhat differently than described due to the administrative flexibility
afforded nonstate entities and the nature, size, and volume of transactions
involved. Accordingly, the auditor should obtain an understanding of the applicable
compliance requirements and project procedures in operation at the nonstate entity to
properly plan and perform the audit.
Internal Controls (Part Five)
Section 215.97(8), Florida Statutes, requires auditors conducting a state single
audit of recipients or subrecipients to obtain an understanding of internal
controls, assess control risk, and perform tests of controls unless the controls are
deemed to be ineffective. Also, auditors are to determine whether the nonstate entity
has internal controls in place to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the
provisions of laws, regulations, and other rules, pertaining to state awards that have
a material effect on each major state project. Part Five is intended to assist auditors
in complying with these requirements by presenting characteristics of internal control
which may be used to reasonably ensure compliance with the types of compliance
requirements in Part Three. The characteristics of internal control presented in
Part Five are neither mandatory nor all-inclusive.
Guidance for Auditing Projects Not Included in the
Compliance Supplement (Part Six)
Part Six provides guidance to auditors in identifying the compliance requirements and
designing tests of compliance with such requirements for projects not included in the
Supplement.
|