Click here to MyFlorida Home Page  
Clear Dot Image Cabinet Affairs

image

Transcript

Audio
Other Dates

 



AGENDA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND

FEBRUARY 23, 1999



Item 1 Matson/Miller Option Agreements/Watermelon Pond CARL Project

REQUEST:  Consideration of two option agreements to acquire 211 acres within the Watermelon Pond CARL project from Duffield Walker Matson, III, et al, and Robert D. Miller, et al.

COUNTIES: Alachua and Levy

LOCATION:  Sections 09 and 16, Township 11 South, Range 17 East

CONSIDERATION:  $175,500

APPRAISED BY

REVIEW Santangini APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION

NO. PARCEL ACRES (12/01/97) VALUE PRICE DATE

903001 Matson/9 170.9 $151,000 $151,000 $135,500 150 days

903002 Miller/14 40.1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 40,000 after BOT

211.0 $201,000 $175,500 Approval

STAFF REMARKS: The Watermelon Pond CARL project is ranked number 16 on the CARL Priority Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State Lands' Land Acquisition Workplan. The project contains 16,600 acres, of which 4,805 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves these agreements, 11,584 acres or 70 percent of the project will remain to be acquired.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.  In the event the commitments for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveal any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the properties or the proposed management of the properties, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing.

Both the Miller parcel and the Matson parcel do not have legal access. The contract for the Miller property incorrectly states that the property will be conveyed with legal access. The Miller contract will be amended prior to closing to reflect the lack of access. Both properties were appraised without legal access and this lack of access is reflected in the purchase price. The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry (DOF), the future managing agency, has determined that the parcels can be managed effectively without legal access.

Title insurance policies, surveys, environmental site evaluations and, if necessary, environmental site assessments will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

In southwestern Alachua County, the original landscape of dry longleaf-pine sandhills pocked with marshes and lakes, important for wildlife, has been much reduced by agriculture and encroaching ranchettes. The Watermelon Pond CARL project will conserve part of this original landscape for wildlife such as fox squirrels and sandhill cranes and for plants like scrub bay, for the protection of the groundwater supply of the county, and for the public to enjoy for years to come.

These parcels will be managed by the DOF as a part of the Goethe State Forest.

These acquisitions are consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 1, Pages 1-56)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 2 Seven Option Agreements/Two Purchase Agreements/Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed CARL Project

REQUEST: Consideration of authorization to acquire 100 percent interest in 70 acres within the Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed CARL project from nine separate owners.

COUNTY: Lee

LOCATION: Sections 26 and 27, Township 47 South, Range 26 East

CONSIDERATION: $120,500

STAFF REMARKS: The Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) CARL project is ranked number 11 on the CARL Bargain\Shared Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and qualifies for purchase under the Division of State Lands' Land Acquisition Workplan. The project contains 59,008 acres, of which 20,055 have been acquired by the South Florida Water Management District (District) and Lee County, and 1,029.5 acres have been acquired or are under contract to the Board of Trustees. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 37,853.5 acres or 64 percent of this project will remain to be acquired.

When the CREW project was added to the CARL list in 1991, a limit was placed on the CARL involvement to encourage local participation in the project. The project was initially planned to be a four party project with equal participation by Lee and Collier counties, the District and the Board of Trustees. To encourage this participation, the Land Acquisition Advisory Council (LAAC) placed both a geographical and financial restriction on the CARL participation in the project. Based on the fact that the Board of Trustees' share of the overall purchase was to be 25 percent and the initial project cost estimate was $40 million, a $10 million "cap" was imposed and acquisition efforts were limited to the Camp Keis Strand Corridor.

While both Lee County and the District began acquiring land within the project, participation by the Division of State Lands and Collier County was stalled. In the CARL acquisition area (Camp Keis Strand), the Collier family was the largest owner. They were pursuing an exchange with the federal government and were unwilling to consider a sale to the Board of Trustees while these efforts were underway. Collier County's bond referendum did not pass and it has been unable to contribute to the project.

On November 20, 1992, the LAAC modified the project design to remove the geographical restriction (Camp Keis Strand) but maintained the $10 million cap. The LAAC also limited the CARL match to acquisitions made by the District after the date of the LAAC meeting. Following this decision, staff began working with the District to identify lands purchased that would qualify for the CARL match. Various options to pursue cooperative purchases were considered.

In 1994, the legislature enacted section 259.041, F.S., which provided the authority to adopt District procedures for joint acquisitions. On June 27, 1995, the Board of Trustees authorized staff to enter into an acquisition agreement with the District to acquire various ownerships located within the CREW CARL project in accordance with section 259.041(16), F.S. utilizing the procedures set out in section 373.139, F.S. At the time the original agreement was entered into, the LAAC-imposed cap on funding was still in effect. The District had already made some purchases in the project and requested that the Board of Trustees match the District's contribution by paying 100 percent of the cost until the Board of Trustees' expenditures equaled the District's. However, since the estimated cost of the parcels remaining to be acquired in the project exceeded $20 million, a 50/50 match on each succeeding acquisition would exhaust the Board of Trustees' funding limit of $10 million before the project acquisition was completed. For this reason, a 50/50 agreement was recommended and approved.


On October 30, 1995, the LAAC expanded the project boundary, eliminated the $10 million cap and designated the project a shared acquisition with the District. As a shared acquisition, the District and the Board of Trustees are each expected to spend the same amount in acquiring land within the project. Since the District has already made some purchases for which it would be credited, staff agreed that it would be appropriate for the Board of Trustees to match those purchases called for under the acquisition agreement. Therefore, the acquisition agreement was amended to provide that the Board of Trustees purchase $13,360,000 worth of land in the project at its sole cost and expense before the 50/50 shared acquisitions will resume. The District has provided documentation, acceptable to the Division of State Lands, establishing the District's expenditure in this project. Following the Board of Trustees' authorization of these acquisitions, $1,728,704 worth of land will have been purchased by the Board of Trustees towards matching the District's purchases in this project. The remaining matching balance will be $11,631,296.

The District has acquired seven options to purchase seven parcels from The Nature Conservancy, Inc., and two agreements for sale and purchase, all at 100 percent of appraised value. Pursuant to the terms of the amended acquisition agreement, the District shall be reimbursed for all costs associated with acquiring the nine properties, including pre-acquisition and closing related costs. The Board of Trustees' purchase price will be 100 percent of the contract price negotiated by the District plus 100 percent of the cost incurred in the purchase of the property. Title to the property acquired will vest in the Board of Trustees.

As provided for in the amended acquisition agreement, the Governing Board of the District adopted Resolutions 98-118 and 98-119 requesting the Board of Trustees' share of the purchase price for the nine parcels, reimbursement of 100 percent of its pre-acquisition and reimbursement of 100 percent of its closing costs. Pursuant to the amended acquisition agreement, the pre-acquisition and closing costs will be reimbursed from CARL incidental expense funds. The District's resolutions contain all of the assurances required by the amended acquisition agreement.

These properties will be managed by the District as a conservation and preservation area with passive public use.

These acquisitions are consistent with section 187.201(10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 2, Pages 1-15)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL


Item 3 The Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Inc. Option Agreement/Survey Waiver/Rookery Bay CARL Project

REQUEST:  Consideration of (1) an option agreement to acquire 1.43 acres within the Rookery Bay CARL project from The Conservancy of Southwest Florida, Inc.; and (2) a request for survey waiver.

COUNTY:  Collier

LOCATION:  Section 31, Township 51 South, Range 26 East

CONSIDERATION:  $1,073

APPRAISED BY

REVIEW Bowen APPROVED PURCHASE OPTION

NO. PARCEL ACRES (07/01/92) VALUE PRICE DATE

903003 Conservancy/182 1.43 $1,073 $1,073 $1,073 150 days after

BOT approval

STAFF REMARKS: The Rookery Bay CARL project is ranked number 4 on the CARL Substantially Complete Project List approved by the Board of Trustees on February 10, 1998, and is eligible for negotiation under the Division of State Lands' (DSL) Land Acquisition Workplan. The project contains 13,482 acres, of which 11,756.36 acres have been acquired or are under agreement to be acquired. After the Board of Trustees approves this agreement, 1,724.21 acres or 13 percent of the project will remain to be acquired.

All mortgages and liens will be satisfied at the time of closing.  In the event the commitment for title insurance, to be obtained prior to closing, reveals any other encumbrances which may affect the value of the property or the proposed management of the property, staff will so advise the Board of Trustees prior to closing.

A waiver of the requirement for a survey of this parcel is being requested pursuant to section 18-1.005, F.A.C., because, in the opinion of the Bureau of Survey and Mapping, the cost of the survey would be prohibitive relative to the expected value of the parcel.

While this parcel is being recommended for a waiver of survey at this time, should the title commitment and field inspection reveal a substantive surveying or surveying related issue which impacts the parcel, a certified survey will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing. In the event a full survey is waived, a professional land surveyor will inspect the property for any visible evidence of improvements or potential boundary issues. In cooperation with the managing agency, the DSL will acquire any special purpose survey work necessary for the effective management of this property.

A title insurance policy, an environmental site evaluation and, if necessary, an environmental site assessment will be provided by the purchaser prior to closing.

Rookery Bay is an outstanding subtropical estuary in the fastest growing part of Florida. Its mangroves shelter important nesting colonies of water birds, and feed and protect many aquatic animals. These animals in turn, are the foundation of commercial and recreational fisheries. The Rookery Bay CARL project will protect the bay's water quality and its native plants and animals and will provide recreational opportunities to the people of southwest Florida. As an addition to the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, the project will also further coastal ecosystem research and environmental education.

This property will be managed by the Division of Marine Resources as part of the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve.

This acquisition is consistent with section 187.201 (10), F.S., the Natural Systems and Recreational Lands section of the State Comprehensive Plan.

(See Attachment 3, Pages 1-17)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL




Item 4 Department of Corrections/Bid Acceptance/Land Sale

REQUEST: (1) Consideration of a request by the Department of Corrections to sell a 0.32-acre parcel of state-owned land in Alachua County; and (2) acceptance of the highest bid in the amount of $245,000, submitted by Capital Assets Group.

COUNTY: Alachua

Deed No. 30306

APPLICANT: Department of Corrections (Corrections)

LOCATION: A portion of Section 05, Township 10 South, Range 20 East

CONSIDERATION: $245,000, to be deposited in the Internal Improvement Trust Fund (IITF) or Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) Trust Fund, pursuant to section 253.034(6)(d), F.S.

STAFF REMARKS: The Board of Trustees acquired this property in 1975 for management by Corrections (successor to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Division of Corrections). The property has been used as the Gainesville Community Correctional Center and consists of two 2-story structures containing approximately 4,923 square feet. Corrections received authority through the 1998/1999 General Appropriations Act to sell, trade, exchange or otherwise dispose of the subject property upon approval of a majority of the Board of Trustees and deposit the sales proceeds in the Corrections' Grants and Donations Trust Fund to be used to acquire, construct and maintain correctional facilities.

Florida cases have held that an appropriations bill cannot amend existing substantive law. The applicable language in the 1998/1999 General Appropriations Act appears to amend substantive law in two respects. First, it authorizes Corrections to sell the property upon approval of a majority of the Board of Trustees, while section 253.02(2), F.S., requires the approval of at least five members of the Board of Trustees for the sale of state-owned lands. Second, the language in the 1998/1999 General Appropriations Act directs the sales proceeds to Corrections' Grants and Donations Trust Fund, while section 253.034(6)(d), F.S., requires the first $500,000 in sales proceeds to be deposited in the Internal Improvement Trust Fund. Any sales proceeds in excess of $500,000 are to be placed in the CARL Trust Fund.

In order to resolve this matter and accommodate Corrections, staff recommends that this sale comply with the provisions of sections 253.02(2) and 253.034(6)(d), F.S. To comply with section 253.02(2), F.S., the transaction will require the approval of at least five members of the Board of Trustees. To comply with section 253.034(6)(d), F.S., the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) will deposit the sales proceeds in the Internal Improvement Trust Fund or CARL Trust Fund and Corrections should seek a specific appropriation to spend the monies for acquisition, construction or maintenance of correctional facilities. Corrections is willing to accept this solution in light of the statutory issues and with the understanding that Corrections receives all the sales revenues from DEP upon appropriation by the Legislature.

Corrections has complied with all other requirements of section 253, F.S., to surplus state-owned lands. Corrections provided notice of the proposed sale to the county and owners of land within 500 feet of the property pursuant to sections 253.111, and 253.115, F.S. No objections were received, and no public agency expressed any interest in managing this parcel or gave any reason for maintaining state ownership of the parcel. On October 15, 1998, the Land Acquisition and Management Advisory Council recommended that the property be declared surplus. The property was subsequently declared surplus by the DEP under delegation of authority.

Corrections contracted to have the property appraised. The market value of the property on February 18, 1998, as appraised by Don Emerson, Jr., MAI, SRA, and William Emerson, MAI, was $228,000. Corrections offered the property for sale by sealed competitive bid on January 6, 1999. The following is a tabulation of the offers received and considered by the advertised deadline:

OFFER SUBMITTED BY AMOUNT OF BID

Capital Assets Group $245,000

Brian Phegley $231,001

Corrections has recommended acceptance of the high bid.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item. The DEP has determined that land conveyances are not subject to the local government planning process.

(See Attachment 4, Pages 1-25)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO PROCEEDS BEING DEPOSITED PURSUANT TO SECTION 253.034(6)(d), F.S.



Item 5 Pan American Construction, L.P. Mining Lease Modification/Bid Requirement Waiver

REQUEST: Consideration of a request to (1) waive the competitive bid requirements of section 18-2.018(3), F.A.C.; (2) extend the term of that portion of lease number 2429, containing 430 acres, more or less, assigned to Pan American Construction, L.P., for one additional five-year term followed by five succeeding one-year terms; and (3) increase the royalty payments.

COUNTY: Dade

Lease Number 2429

APPLICANT: Pan American Construction, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

LOCATION: Section 23, Township 53 South, Range 39 East

CONSIDERATION: Minimum annual rental payment of $20,000 to be credited against a royalty of $0.10 per short ton or 5.5 percent of actual sales, whichever is greater, of limerock extracted.

STAFF REMARKS: On April 14, 1970, the Board of Trustees leased 1,000 acres, more or less, to Seminole Rock Products, Inc., (Seminole) for limerock mining. The lease was granted for an initial term of ten years, with two additional 10-year extensions. In return, Seminole agreed to pay $25,000 in rent for each of the first two years of the lease and $40,000 per year thereafter. Under the lease, these rental payments were to be credited annually against royalties of seven cents per short ton or four percent of sales. Mining of the property commenced in 1972.

On June 17, 1974, the Board of Trustees consented to Seminole subleasing its leasehold interest to Vulcan Materials, Inc. (Vulcan). On February 27, 1987, Seminole formally assigned its rights under the lease to Vulcan, which then became the sole lessee.

On May 17, 1996, Vulcan assigned its "Section 22" rights under lease number 2429 to Florida Rock Industries, Inc. (FRI). The $40,000 minimum annual rental payment was divided evenly between the two lessees. On June 12, 1997, the Board of Trustees agreed to extend the lease to FRI for two additional 10-year terms.

On March 18, 1997, Vulcan assigned its remaining rights under lease number 2429 to Pan American Construction L.P. (Pan American). Vulcan assigned to Pan American "that part of Section 23, Township 53 South, Range 39 East, described in the lease except for the West 150 feet of the South 2,260 feet and less the South 660 feet thereof." This assigned area is characterized in the assignment as "Section 23."

Pan American is now requesting that the Board of Trustees amend that portion of lease number 2429 assigned to Pan American by extending the term for one additional five-year term followed by five succeeding one-year terms. The parcel has been substantially mined, but additional time is needed to extract the remaining resources. In consideration for the Board of Trustees' grant of this lease amendment, Pan American has agreed to increase the royalty and payment terms of the lease which have not changed since 1970.

Pan American will continue to guarantee its $20,000 portion of the minimum annual rental payment which will be credited against a royalty of ten cents per short ton (versus the current seven cents per short ton) of limerock extracted, or five and one-half percent of sales (versus the current four percent of sales), whichever is greater. The royalty will be adjusted annually based on the Producer Price Index (PPI) for construction sand, gravel and crushed stone. The upward or downward adjustment of the royalty rate based on changes in the PPI shall not exceed a change of more than five percent compared to the royalty rate for the immediately preceding year. In no event will the royalty be less than ten cents per short ton. Pan American will supply monthly operating reports showing the tonnage extracted from the Section 23 leasehold during the previous month. As soon as royalties exceed the $20,000 guaranteed rental payment, Pan American will furnish the Board of Trustees with monthly royalty payments in accordance with the monthly reports of mined material. Should royalties on actual tonnage extracted on an annual basis by Pan American be worth less than $20,000, no carry forward of rental credit will apply, and under no circumstances will the Board of Trustees return on the lease be less than $20,000 per year.

Pursuant to section 18-2.018(2)(i), F.A.C., the Board of Trustees shall award authorization for uses of state-owned land on the basis of competitive bidding rather than negotiation unless otherwise determined to be in the public interest. Mining has occurred on the site since April 1970, and the amount of resources remaining to be extracted is limited. It is unlikely that another company would be willing to incur the costs associated with setting up a new mining operation for such limited resources. The Board of Trustees would also lose revenue during the period of time required to set up a new mining operation. Pan American is already on site and mining and is in a better position than a new lessee to maximize both the short and long term return of economic value to the state. Therefore, staff recommends that the Board of Trustees waive the competitive bidding process.

Pursuant to section 18-2.018(1)(a), F.A.C., the decision to authorize the use of Trustees-owned uplands requires a determination that such use is not contrary to the public interest. Since this request extends an existing use, the Board of Trustees has already made its determination with regard to the probable impacts of the proposed activity on the uplands.

A local government comprehensive plan has been adopted for this area pursuant to section 163.3167, F.S.; however, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) determined that the plan was not in compliance. A compliance agreement between DCA and the local government has been finalized. The proposed action is consistent with the adopted plan.

(See Attachment 5, Pages 1-15)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 6 Stella Quitclaim Deed

REQUEST: Consideration of (1) the issuance of a quitclaim deed to permit the reclamation of a 0.2303-acre parcel (10,035 square feet) of land lost as a result of artificial erosion and avulsion; and (2) a request to waive the fee.

COUNTY: Broward

APPLICANTS: Stephen Stella and Patricia Stella

LOCATION: Section 17, Township 50 South, Range 42 East

CONSIDERATION: $15,000 as calculated under the provisions of Rule 18-21.019, F.A.C. The applicants have requested that the Board of Trustees waive the fee in recognition of the cost of the mitigation being required as a condition of the Environmental Resources Permit issued for the project.

STAFF REMARKS: The applicants are requesting to purchase lands lost as a result of artificial erosion and avulsion. The unprotected shoreline has been eroding due to boat traffic on the South Fork of the New River. The adjacent property owners both have seawalls, which are intensifying the damage to the applicants' property.

The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has determined that all of the criteria of Rule 18-21.019, F.A.C., have been met. This includes proof of ownership; documentation supporting the location of the mean high water line prior to and after artificial erosion; documentation demonstrating the adjacent shoreline is bulkheaded or armored; a legal description showing the quantity of land does not exceed one-half acre; the tax assessed value from the county property appraiser's records; the sale is in the public interest since the deed will contain language reserving lateral public access; a copy of the DEP regulatory permit; and the lands are not located within an aquatic preserve.

The applicants are being required to provide mitigation as a condition of the regulatory permit for the project. The project involves (1) the filling of 0.2303 acre along a 342-foot length of shoreline along the New River that involves the placement of 1,192 cubic yards of fill; (2) the construction of two marginal boat docks; and (3) the placement of riprap along the entire length of the applicants' property line. The mitigation required to offset the adverse impacts from the project involves the creation of at least 0.23 acre of mangrove wetland substrate along 250 feet of shoreline at John U. Lloyd State Park.

Under Rule 18-21.019, F.A.C., the Board of Trustees may reduce the fee for purchasing lands to be reclaimed if it is the public interest. Since the mitigation work at John U. Lloyd State Park is a requirement of the regulatory permit needed to offset the adverse impacts from the project, the DEP does not feel it justifies waiver of the fee.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item. The DEP has determined that the proposed action is not subject to the local government planning process.

(See Attachment 6, Pages 1-14)

RECOMMEND (1) APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST TO ISSUE THE QUITCLAIM DEED; AND (2) DENIAL OF THE REQUEST TO WAIVE FEE



Item 7 Edward J. Ruff Development, Inc. Lease Renewal/Modification/ Assignment to Barefoot Boat Club Condominium Association, Inc.

REQUEST: Consideration of a request to (1) renew an expired five-year sovereignty submerged lands lease for a docking facility used in conjunction with an upland nonresidential condominium and dry storage facility, containing 24,143 square feet, more or less; (2) modify it to a 30-year extended term lease; and (3) assign it to the Barefoot Boat Club Condominium Association, Inc.

COUNTY: Collier

Lease No. 111939239

APPLICANT: Edward J. Ruff Development, Inc.

LOCATION: Section 06, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in Little Hickory Bay, within the local jurisdiction of Collier County. Aquatic Preserve: No

CONSIDERATION: $3,546.61, representing (1) $2,728.16 as the annual lease fee computed at the base rate of $0.1130 per square foot; and (2) $818.45 as the extended term lease payment calculated at 30 percent of the lease fee, if applicable. Sales tax will be assessed pursuant to section 212.031, F.S., if applicable.

STAFF REMARKS: On October 26, 1993, the Board of Trustees approved the issuance of a five-year submerged lands lease to Tempustech, Inc. for the construction of a six-slip docking facility to be used in conjunction with a proposed upland commercial marina and private club. The upland facilities would include a clubhouse, snack bar, swimming pool, parking and a 90-unit dry storage facility. The six slips would provide temporary mooring for boats launched and retrieved at the site.

Subsequently, on February 14, 1996, the aforesaid lease was modified pursuant to delegation of authority to change the lessee to Edward J. Ruff Development, Inc., who had purchased the uplands from Tempustech, Inc. on October 12, 1995, and to add 18 additional wet slips, thereby creating a 24-slip facility. The lease expired on October 26, 1998. The applicant made this application prior to the expiration of the lease.

On June 11, 1996, the lessee, Edward J. Ruff Development, Inc. ("developer"), filed a declaration of condominium for Barefoot Boat Club, a nonresidential condominium. In the declaration of condominium, the developer submitted the uplands owned by the applicant in fee simple, together with its interest in the sovereignty submerged lands lease, as modified, to condominium ownership under chapter 718, F.S., the Florida Condominium Act (Act). The developer subsequently sold the 18 wet slip condominium "units," for approximately $30,000 each, to individual owners. The six original wet slips are included as "common elements" to

be used by the dry slip owners. Under the declaration, the Barefoot Boat Club Condominium Association, Inc. (Association), has the right to "build, maintain and use docks, piers, and other facilities in and over the waters of Little Hickory Bay". Under the Act, leasehold property submitted as nonresidential condominium property must have an unexpired term of 30 years, under section 718.401, F.S. Since the modified submerged lands lease had only a two and one-half year term remaining on its five-year term, the creation of the condominium on the leased portion of the lands appears to be contrary to law. The developer and the Association (still controlled by the developer) request that the Board of Trustees issue a 30-year extended-term lease to correct this problem.

Several unit owners filed suit against the developer in the circuit court for Collier County. The plaintiffs (several wet slip and dry slip owners) alleged that the condominium was not validly formed since the submerged lands lease was not for a term of 30 years. The applicant's request for a 30-year lease appears to be motivated by the litigation. Granting the request would have the effect of ratifying the inclusion of sovereignty submerged land in the declaration of condominium.

On July 28, 1998, the Board of Trustees considered the issue of whether to allow 30-year leases when it considered the rule amendments for extended term leases. The applicant's president and his attorney attended and unsuccessfully argued their position regarding 30-year leases. At that time, the Board of Trustees said that the applicant could come back with its specific request for a term longer than 25 years and that it would be considered.

By submitting the submerged lands lease to condominium ownership, a use which was not specified in paragraph one of the lease, the developer violated paragraph seven of the lease (change of use not permitted unless authorized by the Board of Trustees); paragraph eight by making a claim of title to the submerged land; paragraph nine when he sold the wet slip units into private ownership (transfer or assignment of lease without written consent of lessor prohibited); and paragraph ten by conveying the upland into condominium ownership and terminating his fee simple ownership.

Enforcement has not been taken, since such violations must be corrected before renewal of the lease by the Board of Trustees under section 18-21.008(1)(b)3., F.A.C. Further, a site inspection done on September 11, 1998, showed that certain vessels were using more sovereignty submerged lands than had been leased, also a lease violation. A lease modification of the leased area to resolve that problem is pending in the Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP) South District.

Staff recommends that the request for a 30-year lease be denied because it is contrary to section 18-21.008(2)(a), F.A.C., which allows extended term leases of "up to 25 years." Renewal of the lease should be denied because it would violate section 18-21.008(1)(b)3., F.A.C., which requires the applicant be in compliance with all submerged lands rules and statutes. Assignment should be denied because it would violate 18-21.008(1)(b)4., F.A.C., involving the same requirements as renewal. There are no exceptions in these rules, and the Board of Trustees declined to extend the lease terms in the rule to 30 years to accommodate such uses as "dockominiums". Staff further recommends that the Board of Trustees deny the request because it is contrary to the public interest and public policy. Staff believes that this would open the door to other private nonresidential dockominiums, which are not a traditional use for which the Board of Trustees has allowed docking facilities to be constructed on sovereignty lands. Such privately-owned facilities do not provide public access to public waters; would further limit the already limited public usage of sovereignty submerged lands near the shore; and would increase impacts on natural resources. Further, conveying sovereignty submerged lands into private condominium ownership is contrary to the public interest and arguably in violation of Article X, section 11, Florida Constitution.

Additionally, section 718.401, F.S., provides that if the rent under the lease is payable by the condominium association or the unit owners, the lease must include certain specific provisions as set forth in the statutes. This would mean that the standard submerged lands lease would have to be revised to conform to the statutory requirements, some of which are likely to be unacceptable to the Board of Trustees. For example, subsection (d) contains detailed provisions governing actions by the lessor (Board of Trustees) for non-payment of rent or other breaches of the lease, including authorization for payment of rent by the lessee into the registry of the court, and requiring that the lessor must post a bond or other security as a condition for the release of funds from the court registry. If the lessor attempts to file liens for non-payment of rent or foreclose such liens in violation of this subsection, then the lessor may be liable for damages plus attorney's fees and costs to the unit owners or the condominium association. As a matter of public policy, this is not recommended as it favors the private owner and increases expenses to and restrains use by the public of its own lands.

Staff accordingly recommends denial of the request for a 30-year extended term lease, and denial of the assignment. Other than the condominium requirements cited above, the applicant has not shown any "unique operational constraints" under 18-21.008(2)(a)3, F.A.C., which is the test to justify an extended term lease of up to 25 years, not 30 years. In view of the apparent lease violations, staff recommends denial of any lease renewal at this time and, instead, issuance of a temporary use agreement for one year, with the following special conditions: 1) the applicant shall come into full compliance with the lease; 2) the applicant shall eliminate sovereignty submerged lands from condominium ownership; 3) the applicant shall not be fined if it proceeds to correct all lease violations and condominium issues within one year; and 4) if the applicant performs all conditions of the TUA, and is in compliance with all rules and statutes governing submerged lands, a standard five-year lease shall be issued by staff, in which the assignment shall be made. The DEP South District shall stop processing the modification of the lease area until these issues are resolved, and shall not resume such processing until a five-year lease is fully executed and delivered.

A consideration of the status of the local government comprehensive plan was not made for this item. The DEP has determined that the request for an extended lease term for this facility is not subject to the local government planning process.

(See Attachment 7, Pages 1-10)

RECOMMEND

1) DENIAL OF THE 30-YEAR EXTENDED TERM LEASE;

2) DENIAL OF THE LEASE ASSIGNMENT;

3) ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY USE AGREEMENT FOR ONE YEAR WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS; AND 4) ISSUANCE OF A FIVE-YEAR LEASE WHEN ALL CONDITIONS ARE MET.



Item 8 Chapter 18-20, F.A.C. Settlement Agreement/Rule Repeal

WITHDRAWN FROM THE SEPTEMBER 27, 1998 AGENDA

REQUEST: Consideration of a request for approval of (1) a settlement agreement with Save the Manatee Club, Inc., and Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc., regarding repeal of certain rules in chapter 18-20, F.A.C.; (2) publication of a notice of withdrawal to withdraw the repeal of section 18-20.006, F.A.C.; and (3) adoption of rule amendments to repeal sections 18-20.004(5)(a)4 and 18-20.004(5)(d)7, F.A.C.

COUNTY: Statewide

APPLICANT: Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)

(Repeal of rules without sufficient statutory authority)

STAFF REMARKS: Section 120.536, F.S., the Administrative Procedures Act (adopted 1996), required each state agency to identify all rules and portions of rules adopted before October 1, 1996, that lacked sufficient statutory rulemaking authority. On October 1, 1997, the DEP listed the following provisions of chapter 18-20, F.A.C., that, at that time, it believed lacked such statutory authority under chapters 253 and 258 of the Florida Statutes: 18-20.004(5)(a)4, 18-20.004(5)(d)7, and 18-20.006, F.A.C.

Section 18-20.004(5) provides standards and criteria for docking facilities in aquatic preserves. Section 18-20.004(5)(a)4, F.A.C., provides: "When local governments have more stringent standards and criteria for docking facilities, the more stringent standards for the protection and enhancement of the aquatic preserve shall prevail." Section 18-20.004(5)(d)7, F.A.C., provides: "Marina siting will be coordinated with local governments to ensure consistency with all local plans and ordinances." Section 18-20.006, F.A.C., provides standards and criteria for evaluating cumulative impacts arising from applications for activities within aquatic preserves.

To correct the perceived lack of statutory authority for these rules, the DEP drafted and provided proposed legislation to the 1998 session of the Florida Legislature. The legislation, in the form of SB 1438, failed to pass (attached). As a result, the Board of Trustees, in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act, was required to initiate rulemaking by January 1, 1999, to repeal the above rules.

On August 21, 1998, the DEP published a Notice of Proposed Rule Development in the Florida Administrative Weekly (FAW) to repeal the above provisions of chapter 18-20, F.A.C. No requests for a workshop were received. Subsequently, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published in the FAW on September 25, 1998. The next step would have been to obtain approval from the Board of Trustees to file a rule certification package with the Department of State repealing the three provisions. DEP intended to present its request to the Board of Trustees on October 27, 1998. However, the request was withdrawn because Save the Manatee Club, Inc., and the Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. (Petitioners), filed a petition on October 19, 1998, challenging the proposed rule repeals.

DEP and the Petitioners have met to discuss the issues in an attempt to settle the issues raised by the petition. DEP's Office of General Counsel is now of the opinion that section 18-20.006, F.A.C., has sufficient authority and should not be repealed, while the other two rule sections continue to lack sufficient statutory authority.

Therefore, the parties have drafted a settlement agreement (attached) that proposes:

(1) the DEP, as staff to the Board of Trustees, withdraw its action to repeal section 18-20.006, F.A.C.;

(2) the Petitioners withdraw their challenge against the repeal of sections 18-20.004(5)(a)4 and 18-2.004(5)(d)7, F.A.C.;

(3) the DEP agree to notice the Petitioners on any intended agency action to repeal or amend any portion of section 18-20.006, F.A.C., for a period of one year from the date of approval of the settlement; and

(4) the parties discuss options for addressing issues raised by Save the Manatee Club and the Florida Wildlife Federation related to cumulative impacts outside of aquatic preserves, and local government docking criteria.

If the Board of Trustees adopts the proposed settlement, the DEP will file a Notice of Withdrawal in the FAW to withdraw the repeal of section 18-20.006, F.A.C. Additionally, the DEP will file

a rule certification package with the Department of State to repeal the other two provisions of the rule. The rule repeals will not become effective until 20 days following the filing of the certification package, which means the repeal could be effective by the end of April 1999. The proposed rulemaking will result in the rule changes attached.

(See Attachment 8, Pages 1-9)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 9 City of Palmetto (d/b/a Regatta Pointe Marina) Recommended Consolidated Intent

DEFERRED FROM THE JANUARY 26, 1999 AGENDA

DEFERRED FROM THE DECEMBER 8, 1998 AGENDA

REQUEST: Consideration of an application for a modification of a 25-year sovereignty submerged lands lease for an existing city-owned marina to permanently connect a floating sanitary facility, within the existing lease area, to upland utilities.

COUNTY: Manatee

Lease No. 410438743

Application No. 41-01332123-001

APPLICANT: City of Palmetto (City)

a/k/a Regatta Pointe Marina

LOCATION: Section 23, Township 34 South, Range 17 East, in the Manatee River, Class III Waters, within the local jurisdiction of the City of Palmetto.

Aquatic Preserve: No

Manatee Area idle/slow speed/caution zone: Yes

Outstanding Florida Waters: No

CONSIDERATION: Presently, $250 per year. The original lease stipulated that the City pay to the Board of Trustees an annual rental amounting to 50 percent of the total annual rental fees received by the City from any sublessee of the sovereignty submerged lands. The lease also stipulates that the City, upon renewal of the lease at the end of the current 25-year lease term, shall pay to the Board of Trustees the lease fee rate in effect for a facility of this nature. The consideration currently paid to the Board of Trustees by the City is $250 per year. If the staff recommendation to increase the lease area is approved, staff recommends that the City continue to pay an annual rental amounting to 50 percent of the total annual rental received by the City from any sublessee of the sovereignty submerged lands until the lease is renewed in 2006. Under the renewed lease, staff recommends that the City be required to pay the rate in effect for the original lease area plus the expanded area.

STAFF REMARKS: The Board of Trustees authorized a rule amendment on September 14, 1995, to "link" the two processes of regulatory and proprietary reviews and authorizations. The rule became effective October 12, 1995. As a result of this linkage, the recommended Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) regulatory permit decision and the recommendation to the Board of Trustees on the proprietary authorization are contained in one document, the "Consolidated Notice of Intent to Issue," which is attached. The attached consolidated intent contains a recommendation for issuance of a permit under Part IV of chapter 373, F.S., and a recommendation for granting authorization to use sovereignty submerged lands

under chapter 253, F.S., for the activity described therein. This recommendation is provided to

the Board of Trustees pursuant to section 373.427(2), F.S. A description of the requested activity is provided in Section I, "Description of the Proposed Activity." The specific basis for recommending approval of the authorization to use sovereignty submerged lands is contained in Section III, "Background/Basis for Issuance."

Approval by the Board of Trustees is requested only for those aspects of the activity which require authorization to use sovereignty submerged lands. If the Board of Trustees approves the request to use sovereignty submerged lands, and the activity also qualifies for an environmental resource permit, and no challenges are successful, the Consolidated Notice of Intent will be issued and will contain general and specific conditions. In the event the Board of Trustees denies the use of sovereignty submerged lands, whether or not the activity otherwise qualifies for an environmental resource permit, the DEP will issue a "Consolidated Notice of Denial" for both the environmental resource permit and the authorization to use sovereignty submerged lands.

The City is proposing to modify an existing 736,164 square-foot sovereignty submerged lands lease, for a city-owned marina, by the addition of a 947 square-foot floating sanitary facility (a barge with fully enclosed restrooms and showers permanently connected to an upland sewer line) inside an existing boat slip. The lessee has modified the project as originally proposed to eliminate the laundry facilities and vending machines previously located on the barge.

The marina site has been in use for over 60 years. Early development included a pier and restaurant built on an island located approximately 600 feet offshore. The Board of Trustees dedicated a total of 11.84 acres of submerged lands at the site to the City in three separate transactions, dated May 29, 1962, November 3, 1964, and December 2, 1969. On November 12, 1974, the Board of Trustees approved a State Marina and Commercial Dock Facility License to the City for approximately one acre of submerged lands at the site.

On November 30, 1981, the City rededicated the submerged lands to the State of Florida. The rededication was in consideration of the granting of a lease from the Board of Trustees to the City, covering such dedicated lands together with approximately five additional acres of sovereignty submerged lands for a municipal marina.

The original lease was approved by the Board of Trustees on December 8, 1981, for a 736,164 square-foot, 98-slip marina facility. Subsequent expansion of the marina facility by entities entering into a sublease with the City was provided for in the lease subject to "obtaining all necessary governmental approvals."

On February 13, 1991, an application to add 252 slips to the existing marina was received by the then Department of Environmental Regulation. The former Department of Natural Resources (DNR) West Central Florida Field Office received a copy of the application on February 20, 1991. On March 22, 1991, the DNR field office sent the City a completeness summary information request for the lease modification. In the completeness summary request, staff asked the City for proof of authorization from the Board of Trustees for an existing breakwater (constructed between 1985 and 1987, according to aerial photographs) that appeared in the application drawings for the proposed 252 additional slips. There is no record in the file of any response by the City to DNR staff's original request for information or to two subsequent letters warning the lessee that legal action may be taken by DNR if the unauthorized use of sovereignty submerged lands continued. The file's internal routing sheet reflects that the application was deactivated on August 28, 1992, and sent to DNR's Division of State Lands' investigations unit for follow-up inspection. DEP records reflect that the Division of State Lands' investigations unit assigned a lower priority code to the case because most of the breakwater was within the original lease area of 736,164 square feet. As a result, no further investigation of the case was conducted by DNR.

On August 2, 1993, the newly formed DEP issued a wetland resource permit to the City for the addition of the 252 slips. DEP records indicate that the additional slips were constructed within the boundaries of the original 1981 lease, in late 1994.

Staff is recommending that the Board of Trustees approve a modification of the lease to include the 252 additional slips built in 1994 and a portion of the breakwater within the existing lease area and expand the existing lease area by approximately 23,800 square feet to include the portion of the breakwater outside the lease area for the following reasons: (1) staff is of the opinion that the language in the original lease is not explicit as to whether the stipulation that any future expansion be subject to "obtaining all necessary governmental approvals," included the approval of the Board of Trustees; and (2) it is apparent that the Board of Trustees anticipated an eventual buildout of the facility to encompass the entire 736,164 square feet of lease area subject to all necessary governmental approvals.

During a lease inspection of the subject facility by DEP's compliance/enforcement staff on June 5 and June 17, 1997, it was noted that a 46 foot-long by 20.6 foot-wide floating sanitary facility, a portion of a dining deck, and a floating dock had been installed on sovereignty submerged lands without the authorization of the Board of Trustees. The vessel contained seven toilet and shower facilities, a maintenance area, three washing machines, two dryers, two vending machines, a television, a table and a porch. This facility was connected to the available sewer and electric hook-ups at the slip. On June 25, 1997, a warning letter was sent certified mail, by the DEP, to the City indicating that there was a potential violation regarding the floating sanitary facility, due to its non-water dependent use. After a meeting on August 12, 1997, between the DEP and the City, it was decided that the DEP would give the City and the sublessee, American Holdings Corporation, up to 60 days from August 12, 1997, to remove the floating facility. A subsequent site inspection of Regatta Pointe Marina, by DEP staff, confirmed that the floating facility and aforementioned structures had been removed. On November 20, 1997, the DEP received an application from the City for a permit and lease modification to moor the same floating sanitary facility.

The City states in the application that the restroom facilities are needed over the water to accommodate the needs of boaters whose slips are on the outermost reaches of the docking facility. Currently, restrooms, showers and laundry facilities exist on the first floor of the restaurant building located on an island at the end of the main pier. These facilities are for the exclusive use of the boat slip renters and require a key to enter. In addition, a restroom, available for public use, exists inside the dockmaster's office located at the end of a dock extending west about 200 feet from the restrooms, showers and laundry alluded to above. To reach these facilities, slip renters situated in the furthermost corner of the docking facility must walk about 1,700 feet. The City believes that the lack of easy access to restrooms at the marina leads to increasing use of individual heads on the boats, resulting in the temptation of boaters to discharge waste into nearby waters.

Pursuant to the definition of water dependent activity in section 18-21.003(57), F.A.C., the proposed structure constitutes a non-water dependent use because it contains activities that do not require "direct access to the water body or sovereignty submerged lands for transportation, recreation, energy production or transmission, or source of water, and where the use of the water or sovereignty submerged lands is an integral part of the activity." Staff is also of the opinion that the fact that the proposed floating sanitary facility will be permanently connected to upland utilities differentiates it from a vessel containing restrooms and showers that is free to navigate to and from a marina.

Due to concerns over the precedent setting nature of approving a non-water dependent use of sovereignty submerged lands, staff's initial opinion of the project was unfavorable; therefore,

the previous agenda item sent to the Board of Trustees contained a recommendation of denial. Staff's main concern is that as more and more marinas build out on the uplands, requests to place traditional upland uses over sovereignty submerged lands are likely to increase. In the past two years the DEP Southwest District Office has received an application for floating fuel tanks and an inquiry regarding the permanent connection of a restaurant atop a barge to upland utilities.

However, upon further review and consultation with administrators in the DEP's Domestic Waste and Clean Marina Programs, staff is of the opinion that the project has the potential to provide environmental and public health benefits if the proper controls and conditions are placed on the project. Therefore, the environmental resource permit contains site specific conditions and safeguards that should provide reasonable assurance that water quality violations caused by discharges, leakage and spillage of waste material into waters of the state and sovereignty submerged lands will not occur. To alleviate concerns about setting a precedent that cumulatively, on a statewide basis, may conflict with the traditional water dependent uses of sovereignty submerged lands, staff is recommending that the proposed project be approved as a demonstration project and according to the case by case evaluation of nonwater dependent uses allowed under section 18-21.004(1)(d), F.A.C.

Specific conditions in the environmental resource permit require the City to develop a monitoring plan for estimating the volume of sewage discharge by boaters into the marina basin over a two year period. Methods of monitoring shall include but not be limited to the following: (1) fecal coliform samples taken monthly at three specified locations in the marina vicinity (DEP will use five years of fecal coliform data required by the wetland resource permit for baseline purposes); (2) freshwater inflows to the marina and the floating sanitary facility shall be gauged monthly and reported quarterly; (3) sewage discharge from the existing

pumpout system and from the floating sanitary facility shall be gauged monthly and reported on a quarterly basis to determine if there is a rise or fall in usage of these facilities (the City has records of past volumes of freshwater inflows and sewage outflows at the marina that can be used for baseline purposes); (4) the number of human trips into the floating sanitary facility shall be counted daily and reported quarterly; and (5) a one-time anonymous survey of sewage pumpout practices will be prepared and submitted to slip occupants in an effort to assess the frequency of improper discharge of raw sewage and to solicit suggestions for improving compliance with waste disposal requirements.

Conditions in the permit also will provide safeguards against spillage and leakage of waste material such as dual pumps at the pumping station, alarms to signal dysfunction of the pumping system, a hurricane contingency plan, compliance with the specifications for the durability and capacity of pipes and connections pursuant to state standards, and periodic inspections of the system.

In addition, to augment the proposed project's main objective in gaining greater compliance with waste disposal requirements, the environmental resource permit requires that the City supplement the monitoring described above with environmental education measures. In the slip rental agreement all slip occupants will be advised of the availability of instruction by marina staff regarding the proper usage of sanitary services provided by the marina. Other environmental education requirements in the permit are the posting of public information signs that cite Florida law regarding the illegal discharge of raw sewage in Florida's waterways and the threat that such discharges pose to the environment and public health, in addition to the conversion of the area previously occupied by the laundry and vending machines to an environmental education display area.

Pursuant to section 18-21.004(1)(d), F.A.C., "activities on sovereignty lands shall be limited to water dependent activities only unless the board determines that it is in the public interest to

allow an exception as determined by a case by case evaluation." Regatta Pointe Marina is a public marina facility operated on lands under a long-term lease from the Board of Trustees to the City. Marinas exist for the purpose of providing access to and use of the waterfront by the public. The provision of public restrooms over the water would constitute an accessory use to the overall public purpose of the marina.

Staff is of the opinion that the proposed project is in the public interest for the following reasons: (1) this project would occur at a public marina and be approved as a demonstration project, in which the collected data could potentially contribute to the evaluation process of statewide requests for similar projects in the future; and (2) the City will educate patrons of the marina regarding the proper disposal of waste through signage, distribution of literature, and an addendum to the slip rental agreement.

Section 163.3194(3)(b), F.S., in summary, states that a local development approved or undertaken by a local government shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan if it meets all criteria of the plan and all other criteria enumerated by the local government. A letter stating that the proposed action is consistent with the adopted plan has been requested from the City, but to date a letter has not been received.

(See Attachment 9, Pages 1-26)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A LEASE MODIFICATION FOR (1) A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FOR A FLOATING SANITARY FACILITY; (2) AUTHORIZATION OF 252 EXISTING SLIPS AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING BREAKWATER WITHIN THE EXISTING LEASE AREA; AND (3) EXPANSION OF THE LEASE AREA BY APPROXIMATELY 23,800 SQUARE FEET TO INCLUDE A PORTION OF AN EXISTING BREAKWATER SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL APPROVAL CONDITION.



Item 10 PEER Progress Report/Final Order

REQUEST: Consideration of (1) a progress report and the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) recommendations from the discussions held to evaluate the issues contained in the petition filed by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER); and (2) adoption of a Third Amended Final Order that would dismiss the petitions filed by PEER and Save the Manatee Club, Inc., (SMC) and direct staff to initiate rule development by April 15, 1999, to determine to what extent, if any, the rule chapters 18-20 and 18-21, F.A.C., including the delegation of authority provisions of rule 18-21.0051, should be amended to address issues raised by PEER and SMC, and to address other issues concerning aquatic preserves and the rules governing the management of other sovereignty submerged lands. The Third Amended Final Order would also direct staff to implement certain agreements and commitments arising from discussions held with PEER, SMC and others, including Cabinet Aides.

APPLICANT: Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water Facilities, Bureau of Submerged Lands and Environmental Resources

STAFF REMARKS: The Board of Trustees, at its December 8, 1998 meeting, accepted DEP's recommendation to convene a group of interested parties to evaluate the issues raised by PEER in its September 14, 1998 petition, and to report back to the Board of Trustees on the results of the discussions held between the parties. The petition was titled "EMERGENCY PETITION TO

REVIEW THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DELEGATED AUTHORITY FOR SOVEREIGN SUBMERGED LANDS, TO ISSUE A PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PERSONNEL WITHIN THE SOVEREIGN SUBMERGED LANDS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMITTING PROGRAM, TO TAKE OTHER APPROPRIATE ACTION TO PROTECT SOVEREIGN SUBMERGED LANDS, AND TO INITIATE RULEMAKING" (copy previously provided). SMC filed a petition to intervene in the proceedings.

Part II of the Proposed Actions of the PEER petition requested that the Board of Trustees initiate rulemaking to amend chapters 18-21, F.A.C, Sovereign Submerged Lands, and 18-20, F.A.C., Aquatic Preserves, to amend the delegations of authority for DEP and the Water Management Districts (WMDs) to process applications requesting permission to use sovereignty submerged lands, and to amend other rules pertaining to the standards and criteria for docking facilities within aquatic preserves. Under section 120.54(7), F.S., the Board of Trustees had a deadline of 30 days to respond to the petition for rulemaking. However, in an effort to cooperatively evaluate the issues, the parties agreed to waive the deadline for final action on PEER's petition to and including March 5, 1999.

Progress Report and Recommendations

Meetings were held on December 17, 1998, and January 15, 1999, to evaluate the issues. Attendees included staff of DEP, the WMDs, PEER, SMC, and other interested persons, including several Cabinet Aides. At the meetings, the parties held serious, respectful, and constructive discussions on the following issues:

  • Oversight of the Sovereign Submerged Lands Program, including personnel policies;
  • Performance Reviews;
  • Delegations of Authority from the Board of Trustees to DEP and the WMDs;
  • Compliance and Enforcement Actions, including Temporary Use Agreements, and Reporting to the Board of Trustees;
  • Docking Standards and Criteria within Aquatic Preserves;
  • Public Noticing;
  • Protected Species Coordination; and
  • "SLAPP-Like" Law suits.

On January 8, 1999, PEER and SMC filed with the DEP a proposed settlement agreement. Much of the discussion at the January 15, 1999 meeting centered around the DEP and WMDs responses to the proposed settlement. While there is consensus or substantial agreement on some issues, agreement could not be reached on all of the issues. The attached progress report provides a summary of discussions from each meeting, a discussion of issues for which consensus was reached, issues of substantial agreement, and unresolved issues, along with a DEP recommendation on each issue.

Final Order of Dismissal of Petition

As discussed in the proposed Third Amended Final Order (attached), the DEP recommends that PEER's pleading and SMC's petition be dismissed, in part because of PEER's lack of standing to file such a petition. However, the DEP believes that PEER and SMC have raised significant issues that can best be evaluated through public rule development proceedings, and requests that the Board of Trustees, under its independent authority, direct the DEP, as its staff, to initiate rule development proceedings as discussed below.

Rule Development - Delegation of Authority

In its petition, PEER requested that the Board of Trustees create two new exclusions from the delegation of authority from the Board of Trustees to the DEP and WMDs to review and take final agency action on applications to use sovereignty submerged lands. Both would lower the thresholds for projects located in aquatic preserves (e.g., docking facilities of more than five slips or 5,000 square feet of preemption, and additions to docking facilities that increase the number of slips or preempted area by ten percent) under the premise that certain projects in aquatic preserves have a heightened public concern and potential for resource impacts which should be directly reviewed by the Board of Trustees.

While the DEP believes it is appropriate to review the existing delegations of authority, we do not agree to the specific revisions to the delegations of authority proposed by PEER. Such revisions need to be more fully reviewed to determine the impact on staff resources, the benefits to the environment, and the effect on the public. Further, DEP believes that other alternatives may exist for revising the specific project thresholds in aquatic preserves, including but not limited to possibly revising or otherwise clarifying existing provisions which enable one or more members of the Board, the DEP, or the WMDs to request Board of Trustees' review of projects because of heightened public concern, controversy, or potential effect on the environment.

Therefore, it is recommended that rule development be initiated to further evaluate this issue, and allow broader public input into any recommendations regarding the delegations of authority under rule 18-21.0051, F.A.C.

Rule Development - Other Issues

PEER has agreed to withdraw its request to amend several criteria related to the standards and criteria for docking facilities within aquatic preserves. This agreement is based on discussions at the meetings over the intent of existing rule criteria and the force and effect of a draft staff memo. However, from the meeting discussions, it appears that several other issues could be further evaluated through rulemaking proceedings, such as public noticing, temporary use agreements, and the standards and criteria for docking facilities within aquatic preserves. Such rulemaking proceedings could also address the recommendations resulting from the administrative reviews and a recently completed process analysis of the Submerged Lands and Environmental Resource Permitting program. Therefore, it is recommended that rule development be initiated on certain provisions in chapters 18-20 and 18-21, F.A.C., including but not limited to:

  • Forms of authorization, including those for single family docks;
  • Public noticing;
  • Criteria for docking facilities in aquatic preserves;
  • Sufficient upland title interest;
  • Easement fees, including public easements, and application processing fees; *
  • Temporary Use Agreements for unauthorized facilities; and
  • Scope of delegation under rule 18-21.0051, F.A.C.

* On November 7, 1996, the Board of Trustees requested staff to prepare recommendations for rule revisions to address fees charged for leases and easements, including those for public utilities; extended term leases; and special discounts. In 1998, the Board of Trustees approved rule revisions that addressed among other things, criteria for approving extended term leases, extended term lease fees, wetslip rental fees, special event fees, and discounts for open-to-the-public docking facilities. The 1998 rulemaking did not address easement fees.

DEP recommends that rule development, as discussed above, be initiated by April 15, 1999, and that a Technical Advisory Committee be convened to assist in the rulemaking. The committee would be composed of DEP and WMD staff, representatives of the regulated industry and environmental communities, along with other interested parties.

(See Attachment 10, Pages 1-59)

RECOMMEND APPROVAL



Item 11 Conservation and Recreation Lands Program Presentation

REQUEST: A presentation on the Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) selection and acquisition process.

LOCATION: Statewide

STAFF REMARKS: At the February 9, 1999 meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, there was considerable discussion relating to the history of the CARL program, how the Land Acquisition and Management Advisory Council (LAMAC) identifies and prioritizes projects, how the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) develops its annual acquisition workplan, and how it conducts appraisals, negotiations and closings. The Board of Trustees requested that the DEP prepare an overview of these issues so that it could discuss them at its next meeting. In addition, the DEP would like to suggest several process improvements to the Board of Trustees and highlight several legislative proposals for extending the Preservation 2000 Program.

RECOMMEND DISCUSSION OF ISSUES